Technological innovation capabilities (TICs) are important for firms to obtain core competencies and in upgrading a firm’s competitive capabilities. Previous studies rarely examined the relationship between TICs and competitive advantage and firm performance. Moreover, most studies neglect the mediating effect of competitive advantage in the relationship between TICs and firm performance This study uses interviews and the survey method to discuss the relationships governing TIC dimensions (R&D capability, manufacturing capability, networking capability, and human resource capability), competitive advantage, and firm performance. Results are based on empirical data from the automotive industry in Malaysia and are generated by the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method using WarpPLS 6.0. Results show that R&D capability and networking capability improve both competitive advantage and firm performance. However, manufacturing capability only improve firm performance, in contrast with human resource capability only affects competitive advantage. The results of the study also found that competitive advantage significantly impacts on firm performance but does not mediate the effect of TIC dimensions (R&D capability, manufacturing capability, networking capability, and human resources capability) on firm performance. The developed model indicates that automotive industry in Malaysia would perform better with greater emphasis on improving competitive advantage through the enhancement of R&D capability, manufacturing capability, networking capability and human resource capability measured in this study.
REFERENCES
1.
N.
Azlina
, M.
Salleh
, S.
Kasolang
, and H. A.
Jaafar
, “Review study of developing an integrated TQM with LM framework model in Malaysian automotive industry
,” TQM J.
, vol. 24
, no. 5
, pp. 399
–417
, 2012
.2.
M. A.
Ahmad
, M. N.
Asaad
, R.
Saad
, R.
Iteng
, and M. K. I. A.
Rahim
, “Mediating effect of sustainable product development on relationship between quality management practices and organizational performance: Empirical study of Malaysian automotive industry
,” in AIP Conference Proceedings
, 2016
, vol. 1761
, no. 1
, p. 020010
.3.
H.
Ince
, S. Z.
Imamoglu
, and H.
Turkcan
, “The Effect of Technological Innovation Capabilities and Absorptive Capacity on Firm Innovativeness: A Conceptual Framework
,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
, vol. 235
, no. October, pp. 764
–770
, 2016
.4.
J.
Guan
and N.
Ma
, “Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms
,” Technovation
, vol. 23
, pp. 737
–747
, 2003
.5.
R. C. M.
Yam
, J. C.
Guan
, K. F.
Pun
, and E. P. Y.
Tang
, “An audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China
,” Res. Policy
, vol. 33
, no. 8
, pp. 1123
–1140
, Oct. 2004
.6.
M. M.
Yusr
, S. S. M.
Mokhtar
, and A. R.
Othman
, “The effect of TQM practices on technological innovation capabilities: Applying on Malaysian manufacturing sector
,” Int. J. Qual. Res.
, vol. 8
, no. 2
, pp. 197
–216
, 2014
.7.
G.
Karagouni
and I.
Papadopoulos
, “The Impact of Technological Innovation Capabilities on the Competitiveness of a Mature Industry
,” Manag. Int. Bus. Econ. Syst.
, vol. 1
, no. 1
, pp. 17
–34
, 2007
.8.
A. K. W.
Lau
, R. C. M.
Yam
, and E. P. Y.
Tang
, “The impact of technological innovation capabilities on innovation performance: An empirical study in Hong Kong
,” J. Sci. Technol. Policy China
, vol. 1
, no. 2
, pp. 163
–186
, 2010
.9.
M. A.
Shafia
, S.
Shavvalpour
, M.
Hosseini
, and R.
Hosseini
, “Mediating effect of technological innovation capabilities between dynamic capabilities and competitiveness of research and technology organisations
,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag.
, vol. 28
, no. 7
, pp. 811
–826
, 2016
.10.
M. L.
Tseng
, S. H.
Lin
, and T. N. T.
Vy
, “Mediate effect of technology innovation capabilities investment capability and firm performance in Vietnam
,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
, vol. 40
, pp. 817
–829
, 2012
.11.
R. A.
Burgelman
, C. M.
Christensen
, and S. C.
Wheelwright
, Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation
, 5th ed. Avenue of the Americas, New York
: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
, 2009
.12.
M. H. I. bin Abu
Rahim
, “The Determinants of Technological Innovation Capabilities Influence on Product Competitiveness in Malaysia
,”. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2988278 or , 2017
.13.
Ø.
Strand
, M.
Wiig
, T.
Torheim
, H.
SOLLI-SÆther
, and E.
Nesset
, “Technological Innovation Capability and Interaction Effect in a Scandinavian Industry Cluster
,” Int. J. Innov. Manag.
, vol. 21
, no. 05
, p. 1740007
, 2017
.14.
J.
Oh
and S.-K.
Rhee
, “The influence of supplier capabilities and technology uncertainty on manufacturer-supplier collaboration: A study of the Korean automotive industry
,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.
, vol. 28
, no. 6
, pp. 490
–517
, 2008
.15.
J.
Oh
and S.-K.
Rhee
, “Influences of supplier capabilities and collaboration in new car development on competitive advantage of carmakers
,” Manag. Decis.
, vol. 48
, no. 5
, pp. 756
–774
, 2010
.16.
L.-R.
Yang
, “Key practices, manufacturing capability and attainment of manufacturing goals: The perspective of project/engineer-to-order manufacturing
,” Int. J. Proj. Manag.
, vol. 31
, no. 1
, pp. 109
–125
, Jan. 2013
.17.
J.
Shan
and D. R.
Jolly
, “Technological innovation capabilities, product strategy, and firm performance: The electronics industry in China
,” Can. J. Adm. Sci. / Rev. Can. des Sci. l’Administration
, vol. 30
, no. 3
, pp. 159
–172
, 2013
.18.
J.
Shan
and D. R.
Jolly
, “Accumulation of technological innovation capability and competitive performance: a quantitative study in chinese electronic information industry
,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag.
, vol. 9
, no. 5
, pp. 1
–18
, 2012
.19.
B. A.
Oluwale
, M. O.
Ilori
, and T. O.
Oyebisi
, “An Assessment of Technological Capability Building in the Informal Nigerian Automobile Sector
,” J. Bus. Manag. Sci.
, vol. 1
, no. 4
, pp. 55
–62
, 2013
.20.
I. M. Prieto
Pastor
, M. P. Pérez
Santana
, and C. Martín
Sierra
, “Managing knowledge through human resource practices: empirical examination on the Spanish automotive industry
,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag.
, vol. 21
, no. 13
, pp. 2452
–2467
, 2010
.21.
C.
Wang
, I.
Lu
, and C.
Chen
, “Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty
,” Technovation
, vol. 28
, no. 6
, pp. 349
–363
, Jun. 2008
.22.
D.
Faugoo
, “Globalisation and Its Influence on Strategic Human Resource Management, Competitive Advantage and Organisational Success
,” Int. Rev. Bus. Res. Pap.
, vol. 5
, no. 4
, pp. 123
–133
, 2009
.23.
M. E.
Porter
, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
. New York
: Free Press
, 1985
.24.
J. J.
Li
and K. Z.
Zhou
, “How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emerging economy: Managerial ties and market orientation
,” J. Bus. Res.
, vol. 63
, no. 8
, pp. 856
–862
, 2010
.25.
T.
Atkin
, A. G. Jr, and S. K.
Newton
, “Environmental strategy: does it lead to competitive advantage in the US wine industry ?
,” Int. J. Wine Bus. Res.
, vol. 24
, no. 2
, pp. 115
–133
, 2012
.26.
F.-H.
Lee
, T.-Z.
Lee
, and W.-Y.
Wu
, “The relationship between human resource management practices, business strategy and firm performance: evidence from steel industry in Taiwan
,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag.
, vol. 21
, no. 9
, pp. 1351
–1372
, 2010
.27.
W.
Wang
, C.-H.
Lin
, and Y.-C.
Chu
, “Types of Competitive Advantage and Analysis
,” Int. J. Bus. Manag.
, vol. 6
, no. 5
, pp. 100
–104
, 2011
.28.
D.
Kim
, V.
Kumar
, and U.
Kumar
, “Relationship between quality management practices and innovation
,” J. Oper. Manag.
, vol. 30
, no. 4
, pp. 295
–315
, 2012
.29.
P. J.
Richard
, T. M.
Devinney
, G. S.
Yip
, and G.
Johnson
, “Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice
,” J. Manage.
, vol. 35
, no. 3
, pp. 718
–804
, 2009
.30.
Ó.
González-Benito
and J.
González-Benito
, “Cultural vs. operational market orientation and objective vs. subjective performance: Perspective of production and operations
,” Ind. Mark. Manag.
, vol. 34
, no. 8
, pp. 797
–829
, 2005
.31.
S. L.
Newbert
, “Value. Rareness, Competitive Advantage and Performance: A Conceptual - Level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-Based View of the Firm
,” Strateg. Manag. J.
, vol. 768
, no. May 2005, pp. 745
–768
, 2008
.32.
M.
Atalay
, N.
Anafarta
, and F.
Sarvan
, “The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry
,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci.
, vol. 75
, pp. 226
–235
, 2013
.33.
R. C. M.
Yam
, W.
Lo
, E. P. Y.
Tang
, and K. W.
Lau
, “Technological Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance
,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol.
, vol. 42
, pp. 1009
–1017
, 2010
.34.
R. C. M.
Yam
, W.
Lo
, E. P. Y.
Tang
, and A. K. W.
Lau
, “Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries
,” Res. Policy
, vol. 40
, no. 3
, pp. 391
–402
, 2011
.35.
N.
Kock
, WarpPLS 6.0 User Manual.
2017
.36.
W. M.
Asyraf
, “Hierarchical Component Using Reflective-Formative Measurement Model In Partial Least Square Structural Equation…
,” Int. J. Math. Stat. Invent.
, vol. 2
, no. 2
, pp. 55
–71
, 2014
.37.
D. X.
Peng
and F.
Lai
, “Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research
,” J. Oper. Manag.
, vol. 30
, no. 6
, pp. 467
–480
, 2012
.38.
A. E.
Akgün
, H.
Keskin
, and J.
Byrne
, “Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: An empirical analysis
,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag.
, vol. 26
, no. 3
, pp. 103
–130
, Sep. 2009
.39.
N.
Venkatraman
, “Stategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement
,” Manage. Sci.
, vol. 35
, no. 8
, pp. 942
–962
, 1989
.40.
N.
Venkatraman
and V.
Ramanujam
, “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches
,” Acad. Manag. Rev.
, vol. 11
, no. 4
, pp. 801
–814
, 1986
.41.
L. M.
De Luca
and K.
Atuahene-Gima
, “Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance
,” J. Mark.
, vol. 71
, no. January, pp. 95
–112
, 2007
.42.
P.
Sok
and A. O.
Cass
, “Achieving superior innovation-based performance outcomes in SMEs through innovation resource – capability complementarity
,” Ind. Mark. Manag.
, vol. 40
, no. 8
, pp. 1285
–1293
, 2011
.43.
B. J.
Jaworski
and A. K.
Kohli
, “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences
,” J. Mark.
, vol. 57
, pp. 53
–70
, 1993
.44.
J. M.
Becker
, K.
Klein
, and M.
Wetzels
, “Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models
,” Long Range Plann.
, vol. 45
, no. 5–6
, pp. 359
–394
, 2012
.45.
J. F.
Hair
, M.
Sarstedt
, C. M.
Ringle
, and S. P.
Gudergan
, Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. United States of America
: SAGE Publications, Inc.
, 2017
.46.
J.
Hair
, C. L.
Hollingsworth
, A. B.
Randolph
, and A. Y. L.
Chong
, “An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research
,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst.
, vol. 117
, no. 3
, pp. 442
–458
, Apr. 2017
.47.
J.
Henseler
, G.
Hubno
, and P. A.
Ray
, “Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines
,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst.
, vol. 116
, no. 1
, pp. 2
–20
, 2016
.48.
W. W.
Chin
, “How toWrite Up and Report PLS Analyses,” in Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications
, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer
, 2010
.49.
K. J.
Preacher
and A. F.
Hayes
, “SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
,” Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments Comput.
, vol. 36
, no. 4
, pp. 717
–731
, 2004
.50.
J. F.
Hair
, M.
Sarstedt
, C. M.
Ringle
, and J. A.
Mena
, “An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research
,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci.
, vol. 40
, no. 3
, pp. 414
–433
, 2012
.51.
N.
Kock
, “Using WarpPLS in e-Collaboration Studies: Descriptive Statistics, Settings, and Key Analysis Results
,” Int. J. e-Collaboration
, vol. 7
, no. 2
, pp. 1
–17
, 2011
.52.
M.
Wetzels
, G.
Odekerken-Schröder
, and C.
van Oppen
, “Using PLS Path Modeling For Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration
,” MIS Q.
, vol. 33
, no. 1
, pp. 177
–195
, 2009
.53.
N.
Kock
, “Using WarpPLS in e-Collaboration Studies: Mediating Effects, Control and Second Order Variables, and Algorithm Choices
,” Int. J. e-Collaboration
, vol. 7
, no. September, pp. 1
–13
, 2011
.54.
W. W.
Chin
, “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” in Modern methods for business research
, In G. A. M., Mahwah, NJ
: Lawrence Erlbaum.
, 1998
, pp. 295
–358
.55.
M.
Stone
, “Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions
,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological)
, vol. 36
, no. 2
, pp. 111
–147
, 1974
.56.
S.
Geisser
, “The Predictive Sample Reuse Method The Predictive with Applications
,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
, vol. 70
, no. 350
, pp. 320
–328
, 1975
.57.
C.
Sigalas
and P.
Vassilis
M, “Empirical investigation of relationship patterns between competitive advantage and superior performance
,” J. Strateg. Manag.
, 2018
.58.
T. C.
Powell
, “Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations
,” Strateg. Manag. J.
, vol. 22
, no. 9
, pp. 875
–888
, 2001
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2019 Author(s).
2019
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
