Forged Aluminum is regarded as the optimum process for producing light weight front lower control arm (FLCA) with assured internal qualities and high reliabilities since aluminum forging provides the highest weight reduction effect, as much as 35 to 40% reduction compared to cast iron. However due to the high cost of aluminum and motivation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the aim of this research is to develop lightweight material with optimum design of FLCA and achieve equivalent structural performance and function at a reduced cost relative to the baseline forged aluminum FLCA. In this research, the first stage was started with reverse engineering (RE) of forged aluminum FLCA, which RE refers to the process of obtaining a CAD model from an existing physical part. CAD model is prepared using solidwork software and finite element analysis by using Autodesk mechanical simulation software. We constructed a 3D CAD model for both baseline forged aluminum front lower control arm (FLCA) and improved design of FCLA using Solidwork (optimum design). The models are subjected to loading and boundary conditions and then analyzed using the FEA techniques which the optimum design FLCA used the lightweight polymer, polyetheretherketone (PEEK). The structural analysis was conducted to find out the stress, deformation and safety factor of PEEK FLCA. The structural analysis result of PEEK FLCA showed that the standard load given was not exceeded the yield strength of PEEK material, 100Mpa. The safety factor for the optimum design of PEEK FLCA, 1.09 is also bigger than 1. Thus, it showed that it is safe to use lightweight plastic, PEEK as a FLCA to replace forged aluminum and proof that the research aim to develop lighter weight than aluminum is achieved.

1.
Ma
M
,
Lu
H.
,
Design, evaluation methods and parameters of automotive lightweight
,
Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress
. 1st ed.
Society of Automotive Engineers of China (SAE-China) and International Federation of Automotive Engineering Societies (FISITA)
,
2013
, pp.
965
75
.
2.
Felipe
Rodríguez
,
International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) The European Commission’s proposed CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles
,
2018
.
3.
John
German
and
Anup
Bandivadekar
,
International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) U.S. EPA Light-Duty Vehicle GHG and CAFE Standards for 2012–2016he European Commission’s proposed CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles
,
2010
.
4.
Peter
Mock
,
International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) EU CO2 standards for passenger cars and light-commercial vehicleshe European Commission’s proposed CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles
,
2014
5.
Myer
Kutz
,
Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook
(
Elsevier
,
2017
), pp.
784
.
6.
Hallal
A
,
Elmarakbi
A
,
Shaito
A
,
El-Hage
H.
,
Advanced composite materials for automotive applications Overview of composite materials and their automotive applications
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
Chichester
,
2014
), pp.
3
28
.
7.
Sehanobish
K.
,
Engineering plastics and plastic composites in automotive applications
(
SAE International
,
Warrendale
,
2009
)
8.
Shusilkumar P.
Taksande
,
A. V
Vanakal
,
International Journal of Science and Technology
2
, (
2015
).
9.
ACC
.,
American Chemistry Council Plastics and polymer composites: technology roadmap for automotive markets
(
2014
).
10.
George H.
Melton
,
Edward N.
Peters
,
Ruth K.
Arisman
,
Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook
(
William Andrew Publishing
,
2011
), pp.
7
21
.
11.
Bhushan S.
Chakor
,
Y.B.
Choudhary
,
International Journal For Technological Research In Engineering
5
,
2808
2814
(
2017
).
12.
G.
Dhanu
and
R. S.
Kattimani
,
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology
3
,
702
708
(
2016
)
13.
P.
Gunjan
and
A.
Sarda
,
International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education
4
,
305
308
(
2018
).
14.
Mihai-Paul
Todor
,
Imre
Kiss
,
Applied Engineering Letters
1
,
91
97
(
2016
).
15.
S.
Ateekh
,
A.
Naeem
, and
P. V
Jagtap
,
Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
3
,
1814
1818
(
2017
).
16.
M.
Sridharan
and
Dr.
S.
Balamurugan
,
Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol.
5
,
6510
6528
(
2016
).
17.
M. E.
Design
,
A. R.
Pawar
,
M. V
Bodke
, and
A. R.
Wankhade
,
International Journal of Computer Science and Intelligent Computing
3
,
122
128
(
2017
).
18.
Ankit
Patil
,
Saahil
Patil
,
Monik
Shah
,
Nitin
Sal
,
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Design and Analysis of Suspension System with Different Material for SUPRA SAE INDIA 2018
9
,
32
36
(
2018
).
19.
Cristian
Iorga
,
Alain
Desrochers
,
Cécile
Smeesters
,
Engineering Design from a Safety Perspective
,
Proc. 2012 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA12) Conf
. (
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.