B-Pillars are specifically designed to absorb substantial energy with a minimum amount of deformation to limit its intrusion in the passenger compartment during an event of side impact. In this paper, the B-pillar has been developed using composite materials, with the main objective is to improve crashworthiness performance at a lesser weight, as a replacement for steel. The three-point bending test simulations of the composite B-pillar model were modelled, which applied various parameters of materials, number of ply and additional reinforcement. The composite B-pillar design parameter that scored the highest performance to weight ratio in the numerical simulation was then fabricated using vacuum bagging method. Subsequently, the B-pillar was tested under three-point bending experimental work. The force and central displacement results were compared to simulation data and a good agreement was obtained, where B-pillar made of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) performed better than glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The simulation and experimental results indicated errors ranging between 6 and 15%. With the additional reinforcement at the critical area, the energy absorption of CFRP B-pillar was considerably improved by 18%. The weight of the fabricated composite B-pillar was 58% lighter compared to the original steel B-pillar. These results confirmed that the novel composite material holds a high strength, and has lightweight potential to substitute steel as car B-pillar material.

The original version of this article supplied to AIP Publishing contained a typographical error in the title. The original title appeared as, “Finite element modelling and analysis of computer B-pillar,” whereas “computer” should have appeared as “composite.” This error has been addressed and corrected in the article republished on 28 February 2019.

1.
Ikpe
A E
,
Owunna
I B
and
Satope
P
2017
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
11
2693
710
2.
Qiao
W G
and
Shi
W Y
2014
Appl. Mech. Mater.
505-506
380
3
3.
Ansari
Z
,
Mat Rejab
M R
,
Bachtiar
D
and
Siregar
J P
2017
MSF
909
122
6
4.
Zarei
H
,
Kröger
M
and
Albertsen
H
2008
Compos. Struct.
85
245
57
5.
Pervaiz
M
,
Panthapulakkal
S
,
Birat
K C
,
Sain
M
and
Tjong
J
2016
Mater. Sci. Appl.
07
26
38
6.
Wilson
A
2017
Reinforc. Plast.
61
100
2
7.
Lee
M-s
,
Seo
H-y
and
Kang
C-g
2017
Compos. Struct.
168
698
709
8.
Menzel
S
and
Wiedemann
B
2011
Designing Load Bearing Composite Fiber Components at Volkswagen
(
Troy, MI
:
Altair Engineering
)
9.
Wang
Y
,
Feng
J
,
Wu
J
and
Hu
D
2016
Compos. Struct.
153
356
68
10.
Liu
Q
,
Li
Y
,
Cao
L
,
Lei
F
and
Wang
Q
2017
Struct. Multidisc. Optim.
57
965
75
11.
Lauter
C
,
Niewel
J
and
Troester
T
2014
Int. J. Automotive Composites
1
52
66
12.
ASTM 2008
ASTM D3039/D3039M-08 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
. (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
)
13.
Park
C-K
,
Kan
C-D
,
Reagan
S
and
Deshpande
B R
2012
Int. J. Crashworthiness
17
665
75
14.
Mat Rejab
M R
,
Hassan
W A W
,
Siregar
J P
and
Bachtiar
D
2014
Appl. Mech. Mater.
695
694
8
15.
Sun
G
,
Pang
T
,
Zheng
G
,
Song
J
and
Li
Q
2016
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
115-116
465
80
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.