This study aims to identify the ability of students in completing questions based on cognitive level of Bloom’s Taxonomy by Anderson and Kreathwohl of the process evaluation and learning outcomes. The subject of this research is 6th semester students, chemistry education department, Islamic University of Indonesia. This research is a descriptive research. The study was conducted using the test instrument about the process evaluation and learning outcomes based on indicator of bloom’s taxonomy are Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) consisting of remembering, understanding and applying then for the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) consisting of analyzing, evaluating and creating. The test instrument is essay about development and analysis of assessment instrument in process evaluation and learning outcomes. The results show that based on the data obtained can be described on the Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS), the ability of students to working out questions at the level of remembering reached 76.67% “good category”; at the level understanding 73.33% “good category” and at the applying level of 62.22% with the “good category”. While the students’ ability in working out questions on High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) at the level of analyzing level 58.52%, at evaluating level reached 53.78% with both of them “enough category” and at creating level reached 72.44% “good category”.

1.
Y. M.
Heong
,
W. D.
Othman
,
J. Md.
Yunos
,
T. T.
Kiong
,
R.
Hassan
, &
M. M.
Mohamad
,
Int. j. soc. sci. humanit. Invent
,
1
,
2
, pp.
121
125
(
2011
).
2.
T. T.
Kiong
,
J.
Yunos
,
R.
Hassan
,
Y. M.
Heong
,
A.
Hussein dan
M. M.
Mohamad
,
Journal of Research, Policy & Pactice of Teachers & Teacher Education.
2
,
2
, pp.
12
23
(
2012
).
3.
B.
Bloom
,
M.
Englehart
,
E.
Furst
,
W.
Hill
, &
D.
Krathwohl
,
Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain
(
Longman
,
New York
,
1956
).
4.
L. W.
Anderson
(Ed.),
D. R.
Krathwohl
, (Ed.),
P. W.
Airasian
,
K. A.
Cruikshank
,
R. E.
Mayer
,
P.R.
Pintrich
,
J.
Raths
, &
M.C.
Wittrock
,
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
(
Longman
,
New York
,
2001
).
5.
D.
Allen.
, &
K.
Tanner
,
Cell Biology Education
,
1
, pp.
63
67
(
2002
)
6.
S. M.
Napell
,
Contemporary Education
,
47
,
2
, pp.
79
82
(
1976
).
7.
Permendikbud
,
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik
(
Jakarta
,
2015
).
8.
B.
Limbach
, &
W.
Waugh
,
JIP.
pp.
1
9
(
2010
).
9.
Schraw
,
Gregory
,
D. H.
Robinson
,
Assessment Of Higer Order Thinking Skillss.
(
Information Age Publishing
,
Americ
,
2011
).
10.
Nana
,
S.
Metode Statistik
,
Tarsito, Bandung
, (
2002
).
11.
S.
Arikunto
,
Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua
(
Bumi Aksara
,
Jakarta
,
2008
).
12.
P. A.
Facione
.,
Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts
(
Measured Reasons LLC
,
Hermosa Beach
,
2015
).
13.
C.
Semiawan
,
Relevansi Kurikulum Pendidikan Masa Depan dalam Sindhunata
(Ed.) Membuka masa depan anak-anak kita (
Kanisius
,
Jogjakarta
,
2000
).
14.
Zamroni
.
Paradigma Pendidikan Masa Depan
,
Bigraf Publisi
,
Yogyakarta
, (
2000
).
15.
B.
Miri
,
B.
David
, &
Z.
Uri
,
Research in Science Education
,
37
, pp.
353
369
(
2002
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.