Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been studied in modern and traditional tempeh industries in Indonesia. Rumah Tempe Indonesia (RTI), a modern tempeh industry, has unique process production compared to other traditional industries such as in Kedaung, South Tangerang, Indonesia, and has used modern equipment for processing tempeh. These characteristics affect the total of GHG emissions resulted in tempeh produced by RTI. The purpose of this study is to compare the total of GHG emissions resulted from tempeh production in RTI and traditional industry in Kedaung. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool used to estimate environmental impacts of a product or process. In our study we use an LCA method CML-IA baseline V3.01/World 2000 implemented in PC-tool SimaPro 8.0.1 (Pre 2016). The analysis result of GHG emissions impact represents that tempeh produced by traditional industry in Kedaung has lower GHG emissions than RTI does. We obtain that the total GHG emissions produced by tempeh in Kedaung and RTI are about 0.296 and 0.676 kg CO2 eq/kg tempeh, respectively. This result may indicate that the traditional industry, which uses electrical energy for the boiling and splitting processes, produces lower GHG emissions than modern industry, which needs more electrical energy consumption for whole of process production. The largest CO2 emissions in tempeh produced by Kedaung is generated from the tempeh processing, which reaches 98.17% of the total GHG emissions and the remaining substances are generated from electricity. We found that at RTI the tempeh processing also contributes 69.19 % for the total GHG emissions, while the rest come from untreated wastewater.

1.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
,
Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
,
2014
).
2.
G.
Eshel
and
P.A.
Martin
,
Am J. Clin Nutr.
89
,
1710S
1716S
(
2009
).
3.
T.
Garnett
,
Food Policy.
36
,
S23
S32
(
2011
).
4.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
,
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
,
2007
),
976pp
.
5.
E.B.I.
Stehfest
 et al.,
Clim. Change.
95
,
83
102
(
2009
).
6.
A.
Popp
 et al.,
Glob. Environ. Change.
20
,
451
462
(
2010
).
7.
J.A.
Foley
 et al.,
Nature
478
,
337
342
(
2011
).
8.
B.
Bajzelj
 et al.,
Nat. Clim. Change
4
,
924
929
(
2014
).
9.
G.
Blanco
 et al.,
Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report
(
New York
,
2014
)
10.
R.
Ciati
 et al., “Double pyramid: healthy food for people, sustainable food for the planet” in
Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity : Directions and Solutions for Policy, Research, and Action Vol. 2013
, edited by
B.
Burlingame
and
S.
Dernini
(
Food and Agriculture Organization
,
Rome
,
2012
), pp.
280
294
.
11.
J.
de Boer
 et al.,
Appetite
76
,
120
128
(
2014
).
12.
M.C.
Heller
 et al.,
Environ. Sci. Technol.
47
,
12632
12647
(
2013
).
13.
T.
Garnett
,
J. of Clean. Production
73
,
10
18
(
2013
).
14.
W.
Shurtleff
and
A.
Aoyagi
, History of soybeans and soyfoods in Southeast Asia (
Soyinfo Center Lafayette
,
2010
)
15.
N.
Okada
,
Shokuryo (In Japanese
)
27
,
65
93
(
1988
).
16.
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Gizi dan Pangan
,
Data Komposisi Pangan Indonesia
(
Kementerian Kesehatan Indonesia
,
Indonesia
,
2017
), pp.
6
.
17.
P.D.
Babu
 et al.,
World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences
4
(
1
),
22
27
(
2009
).
18.
Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian-Kementerian Pertanian
,
Buletin Konsumsi Pangan
8
(
1
)
2017
.
19.
Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Sub Sektor Tanaman Pangan, 2016
20.
S.
Sahirman
and
Ardiansyah
,
Assessment of Tofu Carbon Footprint in Banyumas, Indonesia-towards “Greener Tofu” in
Proceeding of International Conference on Research
,
Implementation and Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
,
2014
.
21.
R.
Fernando
, “Penerapan Life Cycle Assessment Pada Industri Tahu dengan Ketel Uap dan Bak Perebusan pada Proses Pemasakan,” Bachelor degree thesis,
Universitas Gadjah Mada
,
2014
.
22.
H.
Blonk
 et al., “
Environmental Effects of Protein-Rich Food Products in The Netherlands
” in
Consequences of animal protein substitutes
,
2008
.
23.
K.
Hamerschlag
,
Meat Eaters Guide to Climate Change and Health
(
Environmental Working Group
,
Washington D.C.
,
2015
)
24.
A. M. H.
Putri
and
J.
Waluyo
, “Tempeh Production at Rumah Tempe Indonesia from Life Cycle Inventory Perspective” in
International Symposium on Innovative Bioproduction Indonesia Proceedings
, edited by
Yopi
, et al.
(
Research Center for Biotechnology-LIPI
,
Cibinong, Indonesia
,
2018
), pp.
142
147
.
25.
M-A
Wolf
 et al.,
The International Reference Life Cycle Data System Handbook
(
European Commission Joint Research Center – Institute for Environment and Sustainability
,
Italy
,
2012
)
26.
E.
Schau
 et al.,
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
13
,
255
264
(
2008
).
27.
R.
Pant
 et al., “Analysis of Existing Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologies for Use,” in
Life Cycle Assessment in The International Reference Life Cycle Data System Handbook
(
European Commission Joint Research Center
,
Italy
,
2010
).
28.
R.
Daalgard
 et al.,
Int. J. LCA
13
(
3
),
240
254
(
2008
).
29.
D.L.
Sandars
 et al.,
Biosyst. Eng.
84
,
267
281
(
2003
).
30.
M.C.
Heller
 et al.,
Environ. Sci. Technol.
45
,
1903
1910
(
2011
).
31.
K.
Venkat
,
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
36
,
620
649
(
2012
).
32.
A.
Mejia
 et al.,
Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition
,
1
12
(
2017
).
33.
SimaPro
.
SimaPro
8
(
Pre Product Ecology Consultants
,
The Netherlands
,
2014
).
34.
M.
Brander
 et al., Technical Paper: “Consequential and Attributional Approaches to LCA”, in
A Guide to Policy Makers With Specific Reference to Greenhouse Gas LCA of Biofuels
(
Edinburgh
,
2008
).
35.
M.R.
Denicoff
, et al.,
Soybeans Transportation Profile
(
Department of Agriculture U.S.
,
2014
).
36.
S.M.
Ogle
 et al.,
Soil nitrous oxide emissions with crop production for biofuel: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation
.
Paper presented at: Biofuels, Food, and Feed Tradeoffs, Miami Beach
, January 29,
2008
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.