Medical image processing is crucial in medical diagnosis, and is mainly used in the early detection of breast cancer. One of the effective imaging techniques in detecting breast abnormalities is screening mammography. However, the size of microcalcification appears too small and very dense, producing very poor contrast anomalies. Besides that, the appearances of inhomogeneous background tissue containing low signal to noise also worsen the detection of microcalcification. Hence, it causes problem for radiologists to extract important information from the image. In order to overcome these problems, an image post processing technique is applied to enhance segmented images for easier interpretation. In this study, Mathematical Morphology and Canny Edge Detection methods are used as post processing techniques. The goal of this study is to choose the best method by comparing the MM and Canny Edge Detection methods in enhancing the boundary extraction of images and to evaluate the accuracy of the boundary extraction of the region in an image. These methods were tested on 20 regions of interest (ROI) images that consist of microcalcification which have been confirmed by radiologists. The relative error between the actual area detected by the radiologists and these two methods were calculated. Experimental result shows that the total percentage error using MM and Canny Edge Detection are 6.02% and 4.77% respectively. This indicates that the MM and Canny Edge Detection methods have successfully segmented the microcalcification of mammogram images with 93.98% and 95.23% accuracy, respectively. Thus, it shows that the Canny Edge Detection method is more accurate for the post processing technique.

1.
A. G.
Haus
and
M. J.
Yaffe
.
Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Physics: Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging: 79th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America
(
1993
)
2.
C.
Younger
,
Australian College of Physical Scientists & Engineers in Medicine
1
23
. doi: , (
1970
).
3.
T.
Stojić
and
B.
Reljin
,.
FME Transactions
,
38
,
1
9
(
2010
).
4.
T.
Ji
,
P.
Wu
,
M.
Li
, and
H.
Zheng
,
Adaptive CT Image Segmentation using Mathematical Morphology
.
Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC
), (
2013
).
5.
N.
Senthilkumaran
and
C.
Kirubakaran
,
International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies
,
5
,
5336
5340
(
2014
).
6.
K.
Prabusankarlal
and
P.
Thirumoorthy
,
Journal of NanoScience and NanoTechnology
,
2
,
163
168
(
2014
).
7.
A. A.
Malek
,
W. E. Z. W. A.
Rahman
,
A.
Ibrahim
,
R.
Mahmud
,
S. S.
Yasiran
and
A. K.
Jumaat
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
,
8
,
634
639
. (
2010
).
8.
M.
Jinzaki
,
M.
Yamada
and
S.
Kuribayashi
,
Image Post-Processing and Interpretation
:
INTECH Open Access Publisher
(
2011
).
9.
V. K.
Gunturu
, and
A.
Sharma
,
Contrast Enhancement of Mammographic Images using Wavelet Transform
.
IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT
) (
2010
).
10.
G. J.
Awcock
and
R.
Thomas
,
Applied Image Processing
:
McGraw-Hill, Inc
. (
1996
).
11.
J.
Canny
,
Y.
Chen
,
M.
Kapralov
and
D. Y.
Pavlov
,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
(
2009
).
12.
R. C.
Gonzalez
and
R. E.
Woods
,
Journal of Biomedical Optics
,
14
,
9901
(
2009
).
13.
N. M.
Al-Shereefi
,
British Journal of Science
,
3
(
2012
).
14.
A. A.
Malek
,
W. E. Z. W. A.
Rahman
,
S. S.
Yasiran
and
A. K.
Jumaat
,
Seed Point Selection for Seed Based Region Growing in Segmenting Microcalcifications
.
IEEE International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business, and Engineering (ICSSBE
) (
2012
).
15.
P.
Soille
,
Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications
:
Springer Science & Business Media
(
2013
).
16.
A. K.
Jumaat
,
S. S.
Yasiran
,
A. A.
Malek
,
W. E. Z. W.
Rahman
,
N.
Badrin
, and
S. H.
Osman
,
Performance Comparison of Canny and Sobel Edge Detectors on Balloon Snake in Segmenting Masses
.
IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS
) (
2014
)
17.
D.
Ziouand
,
S.
Tabbone
,
Edge Detection Techniques - An Overview
.
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis C/C of Raspoznavaniye Obrazov I Analiz Izobrazhenii
,
8
,
537
559
(
1998
).
18.
P. J.
Burt
,
Computer Graphics and Image Processing
,
16
,
20
51
. (
1981
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.