Industrial serial robots were usually limited to welding, handling or spray painting operations until very recent years. However, some industries have already realized about their important capabilities in terms of flexibility, working space, adaptability and cost. Hence, currently they are seriously being considered to carry out certain metal machining tasks. Therefore, robot based machining is presented as a cost-saving and flexible manufacturing alternative compared to conventional CNC machines especially for roughing or even pre-roughing of large parts. Nevertheless, there are still some drawbacks usually referred as low rigidity, accuracy and repeatability. Thus, the process productivity is usually sacrificed getting low Material Removal Rates (MRR), and consequently not being competitive. Nevertheless, in this paper different techniques to obtain increased productivity are presented, though an appropriate selection of cutting strategies and parameters that are essential for it. During this research some rough milling tests in Al-5083 are presented where High Feed Milling (HFM) is implemented as productive cutting strategy and the experimental modal analysis named Tap-testing is used for the suitable choice of cutting conditions. Competitive productivity rates are experienced while process stability is checked through the cutting forces measurements in order to prove the effectiveness of the experimental modal analysis for robotic machining.

1.
The Robotic Industries Association
, www.robotics.org, Accessed 18 Nov 2016
2.
I.
Alberdi
,
J. A.
Pelegay
,
P. J.
Arrazola
,
K. B.
Ørskov
,
AIP Conf. Proc
1896
,
090007
(
2017
)
3.
L.
Uriarte
,
M.
Zatarain
,
D.
Axinte
,
J.
Yage-Fabra
,
S.
Inhenfeldt
,
J.
Eguia
,
A.
Olarra
,
CIRP Ann.
62
,
731
750
(
2013
)
4.
J.
Wang
,
H.
Zhang
,
Z.
Pan
, “Machining with Flexible Manipulators: Critical Issues and Solutions,” in
Industrial Robotics: Programming, Simulation and Applications
, edited by
Low Kin
Huat
(
Pro Literatur Verlag
,
Germany/ARS, Austria
,
2006
), pp.
515
536
5.
Y.
Lin
,
H.
Zhao
,
H.
Ding
,
J. Robot Comput Integr Manuf
48
,
59
72
(
2017
)
6.
H.
Assadi
,
K.
Ahmadi
,
K. B.
Ørskov
,
Prog. Can. Mech
2
,
293
297
(
2017
)
7.
COMET EU Project
, www.cometproject.eu, Accessed 25 May 2017
8.
A.
Olabi
,
M.
Damak
,
R.
Béarée
,
O.
Gibaru
,
S.
Leleu
, “
Improving the Accuracy of Industrial Robots by offline Compensation of Joint Errors
,” in 2012
IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology
, (
Athens, Greece
,
2012
), pp.
492
497
9.
Sandvik
Coromant
, www.sandvik.coromant.com/en-gb, Accessed 9 Feb 2017
10.
J.
Muñoa
,
X.
Beudaert
,
Z.
Dombovari
,
Y.
Altintas
,
E.
Budak
,
C.
Brecher
,
CIRP Ann.
65
, pp.
785
808
(
2016
)
11.
E.
Shamoto
,
T.
Mori
,
K.
Nishimura
,
T.
Hiramatsu
,
Y.
Kurata
,
CIRP Ann.
59
,
387
390
(
2010
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.