Non-routine problems are related to real-life context and require some realistic considerations and real-world knowledge in order to resolve them. This study examines several activity tasks incorporated with non-routine problems through the use of an emerging mathematics framework, at two junior colleges in Brunei Darussalam. The three sampled teachers in this study assisted in selecting the topics and the lesson plan designs. They also recommended the development of the four activity tasks: incorporating the use of technology; simulation of a reality television show; designing real-life sized car park spaces for the school; and a classroom activity to design a real-life sized dustpan. Data collected from all four of the activity tasks were analyzed based on the students’ group work. The findings revealed that the most effective activity task in teaching problem solving was to design a real-life sized car park. This was because the use of real data gave students the opportunity to explore, gather information and give or receive feedback on the effect of their reasons and proposed solutions. The second most effective activity task was incorporating the use of technology as it enhanced the students’ understanding of the concepts learnt in the classroom. This was followed by the classroom activity that used real data as it allowed students to work and assess the results mathematically. The simulation of a television show was found to be the least effective since it was viewed as not sufficiently challenging to the students.

1.
M. K.
Stein
 et al., “Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving: Research Perspectives,” in
Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving: Grades 6-12
, edited by
J.
Boaler
and
E. A.
Silver
(
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
,
Virginia
,
2003
), pp.
245
256
.
2.
B. K.
Beyer
,
Teaching Thinking Skills: A Handbook for Secondary School Teachers
(
Allyn & Bacon
,
Boston
,
1991
).
3.
W.
Szetela
and
C.
Nicol
,
Educational Leadership
49
,
42
45
(
1992
).
4.
M. M.
Hatfield
 et al.,
Mathematics Methods for the Elementary and Middle School
(
Allyn & Bacon
,
Massachusetts
,
1993
).
5.
J. S.
Sorenson
 et al.,
The Power of Problem Solving: Practical Ideas and Teaching Strategies for any K-8 Subject Area
(
Allyn & Bacon
,
Massachusetts
,
1996
).
6.
A. H.
Schoenfeld
,
The Mathematics Enthusiast
10
,
9
34
(
2013
).
7.
I.
Bayazit
,
Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice
3
,
1920
1927
(
2013
).
8.
R. I. I.
Putri
and
Zulkardi
, “
Fraction in Shot-Put: A Learning Trajectory
,” in
Research and Education for Developing Scientific Attitude in Sciences and Mathematics
,
AIP Conference Proceedings 1868
, edited by
C.
Kusumawardani
, et al.
(
AIP Publishing
,
New York
,
2017
) p.
050005
.
9.
M. S. F.
Chong
,
Integrating a Local Mathematics Framework in Developing Students’ Competency in Problem Solving in Brunei Darussalam
, Doctoral Dissertation (
Universiti Brunei Darussalam
,
Bandar Seri Begawan
,
2017
).
10.
M. S. F.
Chong
and
M.
Shahrill
,
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
9
, (
2016
).
11.
N.
Abdullah
 et al.,
Advanced Science Letters
,
23
, (In-Press).
12.
R. I. I.
Putri
,
M.
Dolk
, and
Zulkardi
,
Journal Mathematics Education
6
,
11
19
(
2015
).
13.
Cambridge International Examinations
,
Syllabus: Cambridge International AS & A Level Mathematics 9709: For examination in June and November 2014
(
Cambridge International Examinations
,
Cambridge
,
2014
).
14.
E.
Wilson
, “How to do Action Research,” in
School-Based Research: A Guide for Education Students
, edited by
E.
Wilson
(
Sage Publications
,
London
,
2013
), pp.
242
255
.
15.
G.
Anthony
and
M.
Walshaw
, “Effective Pedagogy in Mathematics,” in
Educational Practices Series – 19
, edited by
J.
Brophy
(
International Academy of Education
,
Belgium
,
2009
), pp.
147
164
.
16.
F. F.
Law
 et al.,
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology
9
,
952
962
(
2015
).
17.
C.
Rahayu
,
R. I. I.
Putri
, and
Zulkardi
, “
Multiplication of Fraction with Natural Number by Using Hurdles
,” in
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
,
Proceedings of the 5ᵗʰ SEA-DRIC 100
, edited by
C. F.
Pasani
, et al.
(
Atlantis Press
,
Paris
,
2017
) pp.
43
47
.
18.
M.
Goos
 et al.,
The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
22
,
73
89
(
2003
).
19.
A. I.
Moksin
 et al.,
Advanced Science Letters
,
23
, (In-Press).
20.
J. W.
Wilson
 et al., “Mathematical Problem Solving,” in
Research Ideas for the Classroom: High School Mathematics
, edited by
M. L.
Fernandez
and
N.
Hadaway
(
Macmillan Publishing Company
,
New York
,
1993
), pp.
57
78
.
21.
K.
Stacey
 et al., “PISA’s Influence on Thought and Action in Mathematics Education,” in
Assessing Mathematics Literacy
, edited by
K.
Stacey
and
R.
Turner
(
Springer
,
Switzerland
,
2015
), pp.
275
306
.
22.
G.
Anthony
and
M.
Walshaw
,
Journal of Mathematics Education
2
,
147
164
(
2009
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.