Economic studies of the value of a new good or product innovation are typically retrospective: after a new good has been developed and marketed to consumers, data on prices and consumer choices can be used to estimate welfare gains. This paper calibrates the prospective welfare gains in the United States from a nascent vehicle platform, fuel cell electric vehicles (FCVs), that may or may not succeed in competition with existing vehicle platforms. Prospective gains are due to three main sources: (1) possibly reduced carbon emissions compared to existing vehicle alternatives; (2) the monopsony benefit to the U.S. from reducing world oil demand and hence the price of oil; (3) national security benefits due to reduced “oil dependence”, mitigating the impact of oil price shocks on national income. I find that the benefits of reduced carbon emissions are likely to be quite small because reduced oil demand in the U.S. as only a small impact on world oil consumption and carbon emissions. Net monopsony benefits to U.S. consumers are much larger.

1.
California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board
2015 Evaluation of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Deployment and Hydrogen Fuel Station Network Development
”, July
2015
.
2.
Hausman
,
Jerry
, “The Valuation of New Goods Under Perfect and Imperfect Competition”, in
The Economics of New Goods
,
Timothy
Bresnahan
and
Robert J.
Gordon
(eds.),
University of Chicago Press for NBER
,
1996
, p.
209
248
3.
Hausman
,
Jerry
, “
Cellular Telephone, New Products, and the CPI
,”
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
(April,
1999
) p.
188
194
4.
Petrin
,
A.
, “
Quantifying the benefit of new products: the case of minivan
,”
Journal of Political Economy
,
2002
,
110
(
4
),
705
729
.
5.
Furlong
,
Kevin
J.
, “Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: Hybrid Vehicles”, Chapter 1 of PhD dissertation,
North Carolina State University
, October
2011
.
6.
Murphy
,
Kevin
M.
and
Robert
Topel
, “
The Value of Health and Longevity
,”
Journal of Political Economy
, vol.
114
, no.
5
,
2006
p.
871
904
7.
Murphy
,
Kevin
M.
and
Robert
Topel
, “
Social Value and the Speed of Innovation
,”
American Economic Review
, vol.
97
, no.
2
, May
2007
, p.
433
437
.
8.
Kahn
,
Matthew
, “
Do Greens Drive Hummers or Hybrids? Environmental Ideology as a Determinant of Consumer Choice and the Aggregate Ecological Footprint
,”
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
, October
2006
9.
Beresteanu
,
A.
, and
S.
Li
.
2011
.
Gasoline prices, government support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles in the U.S.
International Economics Review
52
(
1
):
161
182
.
10.
Salee
,
James
, “The Incidence of Tax Credits for Hybrid Vehicles”,
Working Paper
,
University of Michigan
, January
2008
.
11.
Gallagher
,
K.S.
, and
Erich
Muehlegger
.
Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology
.
Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper RWP08-009
,
2008
12.
Furlong
,
Kevin
J.
, “Financial Loss, Welfare Gain: A Story of Hybrid Vehicle Consumption”, Chapter 2 of PhD dissertation,
North Carolina State University
, October
2011
.
13.
Busse
,
Meghan
,
Christopher R.
Knittel
and
Florian
Zettelmeyer
. “
Are Consumers Myopic? Evidence from New and Used Car Purchases
.”
The American Economic Review
,
103
(
1
), February
2013
, pp.
220
256
.
14.
Pindyck
,
Robert
, “
Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
”,
NBER Wording Paper No 19244
, July
2013
.
15.
Hamilton
,
James
, “
Understanding Crude Oil Prices
”,
Working Paper
,
University of California
,
San Diego
, December
2008
.
16.
Baumeister
,
Christine
, and
Gert
Peersman
, “
The Role of Time-Varying Price Elasticities in Accounting for Volatility Changes in the Crude Oil Market
”,
Working Paper #2011-28, Bank of Canada
,
2011
.
17.
Hirose
,
Katsuhiko
“Toyota’s Approach to Sustainable Mobility And Fuel Cell Vehicle Development,”
Toyota Motor Corporation
,
Nagoya
,
2011
.
18.
McKinsey & Company
, “
Power Trains for Europe
2010
.
19.
Ramsden
,
T.
,
M.
Ruth
,
V.
Diakov
,
M.
Laffen
,
T.A.
Timbario
, “Hydrogen Pathways: Updated Cost, Well-to-Wheels Energy Use, and Emissions for the Current Technology Status of Ten Hydrogen Production, Delivery, and Distribution Scenarios,”
U.S. Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-6A10-60528
, March
2013
.
20.
National Research Council of the National Academies of Science
, Committee on Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels,
Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels
,
National Academies Press
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2013
.
21.
Lux
Research
, “
The Great Compression: The Future of the Hydrogen Economy
,” December
2012
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.