During the last decade many people in the nuclear industry were forecasting a renaissance in construction of nuclear power plants, especially in light of the near-zero greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear power and the global need for such cleaner electricity sources. While the accident in March 2011 at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Japan resulted in dozens of reactor shutdowns in Japan and reconsideration of new nuclear power plants in several countries, other countries are continuing to build new plants but not at a fast enough rate yet to make a significant further reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Even before this accident, the prospects for major growth in nuclear power were dim. To explicate the present situation and potential future scenarios for nuclear power, this paper examines the issue of who bears the financial risk especially during the construction phase, the roles of governments in financial interventions such as loan guarantees, tax credits, and prices on greenhouse gas emissions, the effects of regulated versus market-based utility systems, the competition with relatively cheap natural gas, the roles of various governments around the world in determining the use of nuclear power, the interdependent nature of the nuclear industry with companies both competing and cooperating with each other, and the issue of whether small modular reactors or advanced nuclear reactors could result in many more plants being constructed in the United States and worldwide.

1.
S.
Pacala
and
R.
Socolow
, “
Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies
,”
Science
305
,
968
972
(13 August
2004
).
2.
C. D.
Ferguson
and
M. M.
Smith
, “
The Nuclear Option
,”
Foreign Policy
(January/February
2009
).
3.
M.
Schneider
and
A.
Froggatt
,
The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2016
(
Mycle Schneider Consulting, Ltd.
,
Paris, France
, July
2016
).
4.
P.
Leventhal
and
S.
Dolley
, “
A Japanese Strategic Uranium Reserve: A Safe and Economic Alternative to Plutonium
,”
Science & Global Security
5
,
1
31
(
1994
).
5.
T.
Noyes
, “
The Incalculable Costs of Nuclear Power
,”
The Guardian
(3 April
2011
).
6.
Nuclear Power in China
,”
Country Profile, World Nuclear Association
, (updated 5 November
2016
).
7.
G. S.
Hunter
, “
Yuan Buckles After Latest Drop in China’s Foreign-Exchange Reserves
,”
The Wall Street Journal
(7 October
2016
).
8.
D. J.
Trump
,
Statement on Nuclear Power at ScienceDebate.org
(
2016
).
9.
E. F.
Schumacher
,
Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered
(
Blond & Briggs
,
London
,
1973
).
10.
P.
Lorenzini
, “
Nuclear Power: How Environmentalism Lost Its Way
,”
Nuclear News
(November
2016
), pp.
34
39
.
11.
R.
Rosner
and
S.
Goldberg
, Small Modular Reactors-Key to Future Power Generation in the U S (
Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, Harris School of Public Policy Studies
, November
2011
).
12.
A.
Makhijani
and
M.
Boyd
, Small Modular Reactors: No Solution for the Cost, Safety, or Waste Problems of Nuclear Power (
Institute for Energy and Environmental Research and Physicians for Social Responsibility
, September
2010
).
13.
C. D.
Ferguson
,
Moving Advanced Nuclear Energy to Global Deployment
(
Federation of American Scientists Special Report
,
Washington, DC, August
2015
).
14.
S.
Brinton
,
The Advanced Nuclear Industry
(
Third Way
,
Washington, DC
, June
2015
).
15.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
Report to Congress: Advanced Reactor Licensing
(August
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.