The prospects for the future use of nuclear energy worldwide can best be understood within the context of global population growth, urbanization, rising energy need and associated pollution concerns. As the world continues to urbanize, sustainable development challenges are expected to be concentrated in cities of the lower-middle-income countries where the pace of urbanization is fastest. As these countries continue their trajectory of economic development, their energy need will also outpace their population growth adding to the increased demand for electricity. OECD IEA’s energy system deployment pathway foresees doubling of the current global nuclear capacity by 2050 to reduce the impact of rapid urbanization. The pending “retirement cliff” of the existing U.S. nuclear fleet, representing over 60 percent of the nation’s emission-free electricity, also poses a large economic and environmental challenge. To meet the challenge, the U.S. DOE has developed the vision and strategy for development and deployment of advanced reactors. As part of that vision, the U.S. government pursues programs that aim to expand the use of nuclear power by supporting sustainability of the existing nuclear fleet, deploying new water-cooled large and small modular reactors to enable nuclear energy to help meet the energy security and climate change goals, conducting R&D for advanced reactor technologies with alternative coolants, and developing sustainable nuclear fuel cycle strategies. Since the current path relying heavily on water-cooled reactors and “once-through” fuel cycle is not sustainable, next generation nuclear energy systems under consideration aim for significant advances over existing and evolutionary water-cooled reactors. Among the spectrum of advanced reactor options, closed-fuel-cycle systems using reactors with fast-neutron spectrum to meet the sustainability goals offer the most attractive alternatives. However, unless the new public-private partnership models emerge to tackle the licensing and demonstration challenges for these advanced reactor concepts, realization of their enormous potential is not likely, at least in the U.S.

1.
2014 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects
,”
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division
, https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/,
2014
.
2.
Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 - Towards Sustainable Urban Energy Systems
,” ISBN PRINT 978-92-64-25234-9, June
2016
.
3.
U.S. Nuclear Generation and Generating Capacity
,”
U.S. Energy Information Administration
, http://www.eia.gov/nuclear/generation/, February 24,
2017
.
4.
EPA Clean Power Plan
,” https://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan.
5.
Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2040
,” DOE/EIA-0383, April
2013
.
6.
Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap
,”
Report to Congress, U.S. Department of Nuclear Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy
, https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NuclearEnergy_Roadmap_Final.pdf, April
2010
.
7.
Vision and Strategy for the Development and Deployment of Advanced Reactors
,” DOE/NE-0147,
U.S. Department of Nuclear Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy
, https://energy.gov/ne/downloads/vision-and-strategy-development-and-deployment-advanced-reactors, January
2017
.
8.
Generation-IV International Forum (GIF)
,”
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
, https://www.gen-4.org/gif/jcms/c_9260/public.
9.
The International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO)
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency
, https://www.iaea.org/INPRO/.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.