This article aims to study and analyze the 21st Century of sustainable leadership under the education THAILAND 4.0 Framework, and factor analysis of sustainable leadership for science learning. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches in collecting data including a questionnaire survey, a documentary review and a Participatory Action Learning (PAL). The sample were sampling purposively. There were 225 administrators of Primary and Secondary Education Area Offices throughout Thailand. Out of 225, 183 (83.33%) and 42 (16.67%) respondents were the administrators of Primary and Secondary Education Offices, respectively. The quantitative data was analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis including mean, standard deviation. Also, the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to analyze the factors associated with sustainable leadership under the education THAILAND 4.0 Framework. The qualitative data was analyzed by using three main stages, i.e., data reduction, data organization, data interpretation to conclusion. The study revealed that sustainable leadership under the education THAILAND 4.0 Framework needs to focus on development, awareness of duty and responsibility, equality, moral and knowledge. All aspects should be integrated together in order to achieve the organizational goals, good governance culture and identity. Importantly, there were six “key” elements of sustainable leadership under the education THAILAND 4.0 framework: i) Professional Leadership Role, ii) Leadership Under Change, iii) Leadership Skills 4.0 in the 21st Century, iv) Development in the Pace With Change, v) Creativity and Creative Tension, and vi) Hold True Assessments. The CFA showed that the six key elements of sustainable leadership under the education THAILAND 4.0 framework by weight of each elements were significant at the .01 significance level.

1.
Kasam
Masintree.
[
2015
]. Strategy and reform to Thailand 4.0.
Bangkok, Thailand
:
Ministry of Education. The office
.
2.
Suwit
Masintree
. [
2010
]. World change, Thai fine.
Bangkok, Thailand
:
Bangkok Post
.
3.
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education
. [
2017
]. Policy and strategy development of education Quality.
Bangkok, Thailand
:
Ministry of Education
.
4.
PitoonPimdee and PornchaiJedaman
. [
2017
].
Sufficiency economy: dimension of human capital development, Thailand
.
International Conference on Social Science and Management
,
Higher Education Forum
:
Kyoto, Japan
.
5.
Barro
,
Robert j.
[
1991
].
Economic growth in a cross section of countries
.
Quarterly Journal ofEconomics
,
106
:
407
443
.
6.
Bassanini
,
Andrea
, and
Stefano
Scarpetta
. [
2001
].
Does human capital matter for growth in OECD countries?: evidence from pooled mean-group estimates
.
OECD Economics Working Paper No. 282
.
7.
Harmon
,
Colm
,
Hessel
Oosterbeek
, and
Ian
Walker
. [
2003
].
The returns to education: Micro economics
.
Journal of Economic Surveys
,
17
:
115
155
.
8.
Jompoun
Moungkonvanit
. [
2012
]. Organization management and education personnel.
Bangkok, Thailand
:
Julalungkhon University
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.