This study was conducted on the effect of understanding and instruction of the nature of science of Ms. Wanida, a pre-service student under science education program in biology, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. Wanida was a teaching practicum student majoring in biology at Khon Kaen University Demonstration School (Modindaeng). She was teaching biology for 38 Grade 10 students. Methodology regarded interpretive paradigm. The study aimed to examine 1) Wanida’s understanding of the nature of science, 2) Wanida’s instruction of the nature of science, 3 students’ understanding of the nature of science from Wanida’s instruction, and 4) the effects of Wanida’s understanding and instruction of the nature of science on students’ understanding of the nature of science from Wanida’s instruction. Tools of interpretation included teaching observation, a semi-structured interview, open-ended questionnaire, and an observation record form for the instruction of the nature of science. The data obtained was interpreted, encoded, and classified, using the descriptive statistics. The findings indicated that Wanida held good understanding of the nature of science. She could apply the deficient nature of science approach mostly, followed by the implicit nature of science approach. Unfortunately, she could not show her teaching as explicit nature of science. However, her students’ the understanding of the nature of science was good.

1.
Sooksri-ngam
P.
Knowledge on inquiry instruction
.
Journal of Mahasarakham Srinakarintarawirot
. (
7
):
58
78
. (
1988
).
2.
Institute for Promotion of Science and Technology (IPST)
.
Instruction of science domain, foundation education curriculum
.
Bangkok
:
Ladprao Khuruspha
. (
2003
).
3.
Office of the Basic Education Commission of Thailand (OBEC)
.
Indicators and general education domain, basic core curriculum 2008
.
Bangkok
:
Thailand Agricultural Cooperatives Club
. (
2008
).
4.
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]
.
Benchmarks for Science Literacy. A Project 2061 report
.
New York
:
Oxford University Press
. (
1993
).
5.
Bybee
,
R.W.
and Others.
Integrating the History and Nature of Science and Technology in Science and Social Studies Curriculum
.
Science Education
.
75
(
1
):
143
155
. (
1991
).
6.
Gallagher
,
J.J.
 Uses of Interpretive Research in Science Education. In
J.J.
,
Gallagher
(Ed.)
Interpretive Research in Science Education
.
Kansas, USA
:
NARST
. (
1991
).
7.
Lederman
,
N. G.
Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: Factors That Facilitate or Impede the Relationship
.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
.
36
(
8
):
916
929
. (
1999
).
8.
Lederman
,
N. G.
Research on Nature of Science: Reflections on the Past, Anticipations of the Future
.
Asia – Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching
.
7
(
1
):
1
11
. (
2006
).
9.
Lederman
,
N. G.
and
Lederman
,
J. S.
Revising Instruction to Teach Nature of Science
.
The Science Teacher
.
71
(
9
):
36
39
. (
2004
).
10.
McComas
,
W. F.
,
Almazroa
,
H.
, and
Clough
,
M. P.
The nature of science in science education: An introduction
.
Science and Education
.
7
:
511
532
. (
1998
).
11.
Meesri
,
S.
A Development of Professional Development Program for Enhancing Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Its Implementation in the Classroom.
Doctor of Education Thesis in Science Education,
Srinakharinwirot University. (copy
) (
2007
).
12.
Rudge
,
D. W.
and
Howe
,
E. M.
An Explicit and Reflective Approach to the Use History to Promote Understanding of the Nature of Science
.
Science and Education
.
18
(
5
):
561
580
. (
2009
).
13.
Tillery
,
B. W.
,
Enger
,
E. D.
and
Ross
,
F. C.
Integrated Science
. 4th ed.
Boston
:
McGraw – Hill
. (
2008
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.