This qualitative research aimed to review what primary teachers think about how to teach science in rural school contexts. Three primary schools in Thailand were purposively chosen for this study. Eleven primary science teachers of these schools were the research participants. Questionnaires, interviews, and observations were implemented to reveal the primary school teachers’ educational backgrounds, science teaching context, and need for self-driven professional development. Content and discourse analysis indicated that the non-science educational background and the science teaching context implied a need for self-driven professional development. The non-science educational background teachers were generally unfamiliar with the current national science curriculum, and that they would not be comfortable when the researcher observed their science teaching practice. They also believed that experimentation was the only one strategy for teaching science, and that the priority for their teaching support was teaching media rather than their understanding of scientific concepts or teaching strategies. As implication of this research, subsequent developments on science teacher profession in rural context, therefore, need to promote teachers’ understandings of nature of science and technological and pedagogical content knowledge. In addition, they should be challenged to practice on critically participatory action research for academic growth and professional learning community.

1.
C.
Howe
and
H.S.
Stubbs
, “
Empowering science teachers: A model for professional development
.”
Journal of Science Teacher Education
8
, no.
3
,
167
182
(
1996
).
2.
C.
Rukponlamuang
,
Final Report on Lack Situation of Teacher in Basic Education
. (
Prig Wan Graphic Co.,Ltd
,
Bangkok
,
2005
).
3.
D.
Hodson
, “
Bulding a Case for a Socioculture and Inquiry-Oriented View of Science Education
.”
Journal of Science Education and Technology
,
8
,
241
249
(
1999
).
4.
F.
McComas
,
H.
Almazroa
and
P.
Clough
, “
The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction
,”.
Science and Education
7
,
511
532
(
1998
).
5.
Garbett
, “
Developing pedagogical practices to enhance confidence and competence in science teacher education
,”
Journal of Science Teacher Education
22
,
729
743
(
2011
).
6.
H.
Akcay
and
R.
Yager
, “
Accomplishing the vision for teacher education programs advocated in the national science education standards
.”
Journal of Science Teacher Education
21
no.
6
,
643
664
(
2010
).
7.
J. G.
Freeman
,
R.W.
Marx
, and
L.
Cimellaro
, “
Emerging considerations for professional development institutes for science teachers
.”
Journal of Science Teacher Education
15
, no.
2
,
111
131
(
2004
).
8.
J.
Harris
,
P.
Mishra
and
M.
Koehler
, “
Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: curriculum-based technology integration reframed
,”
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
41
no.
4
,
393
416
(
2009
).
9.
J.
Lee
, “
Teacher Receptivity to Curriculum Change in The Implementation Stage: The Case of Environmenal Education in Hongkong
.”
Journal of Curriculum Studies
32
,
95
115
(
2000
).
10.
J.
Trna
and
E.
Trnova
. “
The current paradigms of science education and their expected impact on curriculum
.”
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
197
,
271
277
(
2015
).
11.
K.
Goodnough
, “
Professional learning of K-6 teachers in science through collaborative action research: an activity theory analysis
,”
Journal of Science Teacher Education
27
,
747
767
(
2016
).
12.
K.
Goodnough
, “
Teacher development through action research
,”
Action in Teacher Education
23
no.
1
,
37
46
(
2001
).
13.
K.
Jaipal
and
C.
Figg
, “
Collaborative action research approaches promoting professional development for elementary school teachers
.”
Educational Action Research
19
, no.
1
,
59
72
(
2011
).
14.
L.
Cohen
,
L.
Manion
and
K.
Morrison
,
Research Methods in Education
, 5thEds. (
Routledge Falmer
,
London
,
2000
).
15.
M.
Koutselini
and
F.
Patsalidou
, “
Engaging school teachers and school principals in an action research in-service development as a means of pedagogical self-awareness
,”
Educational Action Research
23
no.
2
,
124
139
(
2015
).
16.
M.P.E.
Morales
, “
Participatory action research (PAR) cum action research (AR) in teacher professional development: A literature review
.”
International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES)
2
, no.
1
,
156
165
(
2016
).
17.
Ministry of
Education
,
The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551 (A.D.2008)
(
Office of the Basic Education Commission
,
Bangkok
,
2008
).
18.
Ministry of
Education
,
The National Primary Curriculum B.E.2521 (revision B.E.2533)
(
Kurusapa Co.,Ltd
,
Bangkok
,
1990
).
19.
Office of Commercial
Services
,
Teacher Development for Quality Learning: The Thailand Education Reform Project
(
Queensland University of Technology
,
Brisbane, Australia
,
2002
).
20.
Office of the Basic Education Commission
,
Evaluation of Teacher Competency (Revised Version)
(
Office of the Basic Education Commission
,
Bangkok
,
2010
).
21.
Office of the National Education Commission
,
National Education Act B.E.2542 (1999)
. (
Prig Wan Graphic Co.,Ltd
,
Bangkok
,
1999
).
22.
R. A.
Schibeci
and
R. L.
Hickey
, “
Dimensions of autonomy: Primary teachers’ decisions about involvement in science professional development
.”
Science Education
88
, no.
1
:
119
145
(
2003
).
23.
R.
Driver
 et al,
Young People’s Images of Science
(
Open University Press
,
Buckingham
,
1996
).
24.
S.
Dumbrajs
and
T.
Keinonen
, “
Science Instruction in Comprehensive School: Pre-and In-Service Teachers’ Ideas
,”
The International Journal of Learning
,
15
,
95
103
(
2008
).
25.
S.
Kemmis
,
R.
McTaggart
and
R.
Nixon
,
The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research
(
Springer
,
Singapore
,
2014
).
26.
S.
Kijkuakul
,
N.
Yutakom
,
V.
Roadrangka
,
A.
Engkagul
,
M.
Barker
and
C.
Eames
, “
Teacher Tensions When Adopting a New Approach to Teaching about Photosynthesis
,”
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia
31
,
65
78
(
2008
).
27.
S.
Loucks-Horsley
,
N.
Love
,
K.E.
Stiles
,
S.
Mundry
and
P. W.
Hewson
,
Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics
2nd ed. (
Corwin Press
,
CA
,
2003
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.