This mixed research, is a snapshot of some Filipino Biology teachers’ knowledge structure and how their concepts of the five topics in Biology (Photosynthesis, Cellular Respiration, human reproductive system, Mendelian genetics and NonMendelian genetics) functions and develops inside a biology classroom. The study focuses on the six biology teachers and a total of 222 students in their respective classes. Of the Six (6) teachers, three (3) are under the Science curriculum and the other three (3) are under regular curriculum in both public and private schools in Iligan city and Lanao del Norte, Philippines. The study utilized classroom discourses, concept maps, interpretative case-study method, bracketing method, and concept analysis for qualitative part; the quantitative part uses a nonparametric statistical tool, Kendall’s tau Coefficient for determining relationship and congruency while measures of central tendencies and dispersion (mean, and standard deviation) for concept maps scores interpretation. Knowledge Base of Biology teachers were evaluated by experts in field of specialization having a doctorate program (e.g. PhD in Genetics) and PhD Biology candidates. The data collection entailed seven (7) months immersion: one (1) month for preliminary phase for the researcher to gain teachers’ and students’ confidence and the succeeding six (6) months for main observation and data collection. The evaluation of teachers’ knowledge base by experts indicated that teachers’ knowledge of (65%) is lower than the minimum (75%) recommended by ABD-el-Khalick and Boujaoude (1997). Thus, the experts believe that content knowledge of the teachers is hardly adequate for their teaching assignment. Moreover, the teachers in this study do not systematically use reallife situation to apply the concepts they teach. They can identify concepts too abstract for their student; however, they seldom use innovative ways to bring the discussion to their students’ level of readiness and capacity to learn. Kendall’s Tau Coefficient of agreement indicated that there is an agreement of the rating by experts and PhD (Biology) candidates. As for recommended level for teaching based on the respondent content knowledge structure, the experts and the PhD (Biology) candidates agree that the content knowledge of the teachers is at the borderline (rating of 6) between elementary and high school. These results imply that biology teachers need in-service training to upgrade their content knowledge in the subject. At the same time, the pre-service curriculum for biology teachers needs upgrading.

1.
Abd-El-Khalik
and
F and S.
BouJaude
An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching
.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
.
34
:
7
(
673
699
). (
1977
).
2.
Brown
D.
and
A.
Lourdusamy
Concept Mapping as an Alternative Technioque for assessing Student Understanding of Science
.
Journal of science Teaching
.
4
.
212
219
. (
1996
).
3.
Ibe
,
M. D.
Seminar: Issues and Trends in Science and Technology Education
.
Philippines
. (
1997
).
4.
Dorough
D. L.
and
J. A.
Rye
Mapping for Understanding
.
The Science Teacher
. p.
37
41
. (
1997
).
5.
Lian
,
M.. W.
An Investigation Into High-Achiever and Low-Achiever Knowledge Organisation and Knowledge Processing in Concept Mapping: A case Study
.
Research in Science Education
.
28
(
3
), p.
337
352
. (
1998
).
6.
Malone
,
J
and
J.
Dekker
The Concept Map as an Aid to Instruction in Science and Mathematics
.
School Science and Mathematics
,
84
(
3
),
220
231
. (
1984
).
7.
McClure
,
J. R.
,
Sonak
B.
and
H. K.
Suen
Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicability
.
Journal Research in Science Teaching
.
36
(
4
),
45
492
. (
1999
).
8.
Novak
,
J. D.
Concept Mapping: a Useful Tool for Science Education
.
Journal of Research in science Teaching
,
10
,
923
949
. (
1990
).
9.
Thorley
,
N. R.
and
R. T.
Stofflet
Representation of Conceptual Change Model in Science teacher Education
.
Science Education
,
80
(
3
),
317
339
. (
1996
).
10.
Winitzky
,
N.
,
D.
Kauchak
and
M.
Kelly
Measuring Teacher Structural Knowledge
.
Teacher and Teacher Education
.
10
.
125
139
. (
1994
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.