The use of industrial robots for machining could lead to high cost and energy savings for the manufacturing industry. Machining robots offer several advantages respect to CNC machines such as flexibility, wide working space, adaptability and relatively low cost. However, there are some drawbacks that are preventing a widespread adoption of robotic solutions namely lower stiffness, vibration/chatter problems and lower accuracy and repeatability. Normally due to these issues conservative cutting parameters are chosen, resulting in a low material removal rate (MRR). In this article, an example of a modal analysis of a robot is presented. For that purpose the Tap-testing technology is introduced, which aims at maximizing productivity, reducing the uncertainty in the selection of cutting parameters and offering a stable process free from chatter vibrations.

Topics
Robotics, Modal analysis, Machining, Educational assessment, Industry
1.
I.
 
Iglesias
,
M.A
 
Sebastián
,
J.E.
 
Ares
, “
Overview of the state of robotic machining: Current situation and future potential
”,
The Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference
, (
Barcelona
,
2015
), pp.
911
–
917
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
H.
 
Zhang
 and
Z.
 
Pan
, “
Robotic Machining: Material Removal Rate Control with a Flexible Manipulator
”,
IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics
, (
Chengdu, China
,
2008
) pp.
30
–
35
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
J.
 
Depree
 and
C.
 
Gesswein
, “
Robotic Machining, White Paper Project
” (
2008
), available at: http://www.robotics.org/robotic-content.cfm/Robotics/Halcyon-Development-RIA/id/43.
Google Scholar
 
4.
Z.
 
Pan
 and
H.
 
Zhang
, “
Robotic machining from programming to process control
,” in 
Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation
, (
Chongqing, China
,
2008
), pp.
553
–
558
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
O.
 
Sörnmo
,
B.
 
Olofsson
,
A.
 
Robertsson
,
R.
 
Johansson
, “
Increasing Time-Efficiency and Accuracy of Robotic Machining Process Using Model-Based Adaptive Force Control
”
10th International IFAC Symposium on Robot Control
(
Dubrovnik
,
2012
) pp.
543
–
548
.
Google Scholar
 
6.
H.
 
Zhang
 and
Z.
 
Pan
, “
Improving robotic machining accuracy by real-time compensation
”,
ICCAS-SICE International Joint Conference
, (
IEEE
,
USA
,
2009
), pp.
4289
–
4294
.
Google Scholar
 
7.
O.
 
Sörnmo
,
B.
 
Olofsson
,
U.
 
Schneider
,
A.
 
Robertsson
,
R.
 
Johansson
, “
Increasing the milling accuracy for industrial robots using a piezo-actuated high-dynamic micro manipulator
,”
international Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics
, (
Kaohsiung, Taiwan
,
2012
), pp.
104
–
110
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
J.
 
Bauer
,
M.
 
Friedmann
,
T.
 
Hemker
,
M.
 
Pischan
,
C.
 
Reinl
,
E.
 
Abele
,
O.
 
Stryk
, “Analysis of Industrial Robot Structure and Milling Process Interaction for Path Manipulation”. In:
B.
 
Denkena
 and
F.
 
Hollmann
 (Hg.):
Process Machine Interactions
:
Springer
 
Berlin Heidelberg
(Lec. Notes in Production Engineering) (
2013
), pp.
245
–
263
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
C.
 
Bisu
,
M.
 
Cherif
,
A.
 
Gerard
 and
K’Nevez
, “
Dynamic Behavior Analysis for a Six Axis Industrial Machining Robot
”,
Journal of Advanced Materials Research
, (
2012
),
423
, pp.
65
–
76
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.423.65
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
K’Nevez
,
M.
 
Cherif
,
M.
 
Zapciu
,
A.
 
Gerard
, “
Experimental characterization of robot arm rigidity in order to be used in machining operation
”,
19th Int. Conf. on Manufacturing System
(
Bucharest
,
2010
), pp.
153
–
156
.
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2017 Author(s).
2017
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.