In support to the nation’s goal of developing a liveable city, Malaysian government aims to improve the mobility in Kuala Lumpur by providing good quality transit services across the city. However, the public starts to demand for more than just a connectivity between two points. They want their transit journey to be comfortable and pleasant from the very first mile. The key here is the first and last mile (FLM) of the transit service which defines their journey to access the station itself. The question is, does the existing transit services’ FLM satisfy public’s needs? Therefore, many studies had emerged in attempt to assess the pedestrian-friendliness. While most of them did base on the pedestrian’s perceptions, there were also studies that spatially measured the connectivity and accessibility to various landuses and point of interests. While both can be a good method, their integration could actually produce a better assessment. However, till date, only a few studies had attempted to do so. This paper proposes a framework to develop a Spatial Walkability Index (SWI) by integrating a multicriteria evaluation technique, Analytical Network Process (ANP) and network analysis on geographical information system (GIS) platform. First, ANP will aggregate the degree of importance for each walkability criteria based on the pedestrian’s perceptions. Then, the network analysis will use the weighted criteria as attributes to find the walkable routes within half mile radius from each station. The index will be calculated by rationing the total length of walkable routes in respect to the available footpath. The final outcome is a percentage of walkable FLM transit routes for each station which will be named as the SWI. It is expected that the developed framework can be applied in other cities across the globe. It can also be improvised to suit the demand and purpose there.

1.
Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat (S.P.A.D.)
,
National Land Public Transport Masterplan
:
Malaysia
.
2011
.
2.
Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat (S.P.A.D.)
, Greater KL/Klang Valley Land Public Transport Master Plan.
Kuala Lumpur
:
Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat (S.P.A.D)
,
2016
.
3.
D. I.
Inani
,
H. Abdul
Karim
, and
M. Z. Mohd
Amin
, “Walking Behavior of Urban and Rural Streets,”
J. Asian Behav. Stud.
, vol.
11
, no. July
2013
, pp.
97
110
,
2013
.
4.
R. H.
Lo
, “
Walkability: what is it?
,”
J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain.
, vol.
2
, no.
2
, pp.
145
166
,
2009
.
5.
Transport For London
, “
Transport for London: Improving walkability
,” no. September,
2005
.
6.
N. I.
Bahari
,
A. K.
Arshad
, and
Z.
Yahya
, “
Pedestrians’ perception of the sidewalk facilities in Kuala Lumpur’s commercial areas
,”
Int. Sustain. Civ. Eng. J.
, vol.
1
, no.
2
, pp.
28
36
,
2012
.
7.
S.
Shamsuddin
,
N.
Rasyiqah
, and
A.
Hassan
, “
Walkable in Order To Be Livable
,”
J. Asian Behav. Stud.
, vol.
3
, pp.
112
121
,
2013
.
8.
Z.
Rahimiashtiani
and
N.
Ujang
, “
Pedestrian Satisfaction with Aesthetic, Attractiveness and Pleasurability: Evaluating the Walkability of Chaharaghabbasi Street in Isfahan, Iran
,”
Alam Cipta
, vol.
6
, no.
2
, pp.
13
22
,
2013
.
9.
J.
Zakaria
and
N.
Ujang
, “
Comfort of Walking in the City Center of Kuala Lumpur
,”
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
, vol.
170
, pp.
642
652
,
2015
.
10.
R. N. R.
Ariffin
and
R. K.
Zahari
, “
Perceptions of the Urban Walking Environments
,”
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
, vol.
105
, pp.
589
597
,
2013
.
11.
H. S.
Hasibuan
,
T. P.
Soemardi
,
R.
Koestoer
, and
S.
Moersidik
, “
The Role of Transit Oriented Development in Constructing Urban Environment Sustainability, the Case of Jabodetabek, Indonesia
,”
Procedia Environ. Sci.
, vol.
20
, pp.
622
631
,
2014
.
12.
L.
David
,
S.
Åse
,
S.
Catharina
, and
J.
Maria
, “
What limits the pedestrian? Exploring perceptions of walking in the built environment and in the context of every-day life
,”
J. Transp. Heal.
, vol.
1
, no.
4
, pp.
223
231
,
2014
.
13.
E.
Leslie
,
B.
Saelens
,
L.
Frank
,
N.
Owen
,
A.
Bauman
,
N.
Coffee
, and
G.
Hugo
, “
Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: A pilot study
,”
Heal. Place
, vol.
11
, no.
3
, pp.
227
236
,
2005
.
14.
K.
Chang
,
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems
, 6th ed.
New York
:
McGraw-Hill Education
,
2012
.
15.
P. A.
Longley
,
M. F.
Goodchild
,
D. J.
Maguire
, and
D. W.
Rhind
, Geographic Information Systems & Science, 3rd ed.
Danvers
:
John Wiley & Sons
,
2011
.
16.
B.
Giles-Corti
,
S.
Mavoa
,
S.
Eagleson
,
M.
Davern
,
R.
Roberts
, and
H.
Badland
, “
How Walkable is Melbourne? The Development of a Transport Walkability Index For Metropolitan Melbourne. Place, Health and Liveability Research Program
,”
2014
.
17.
M.
Foda
and
A.
Osman
, “
Using GIS for Measuring Transit Stop Accessibility Considering Actual Pedestrian Road Network
,”
J. Public Transp.
, vol.
13
, no. Tcrp
1996
, pp.
23
40
,
2010
.
18.
E.
Cubukcu
,
B.
Hepguzel
,
Z.
Onder
, and
B.
Tumer
, “
Active Living for Sustainable Future: A Model to Measure ‘Walk Scores’ via Geographic Information Systems
,”
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
, vol.
168
, pp.
229
237
,
2015
.
19.
M.
Hasmi
,
H. N.
Abdul
,
T. P.
Leong
,
M.
Masria
, and
S.
Rohana
, “
Towards predicting the walkability of pedestrian rail commuters in Kuala Lumpur conurbation
,”
2nd Int. Conf. “Global Trends Acad. Res.
, vol.
2
, pp.
280
298
,
2015
.
20.
T.
Lin
,
J.
Xia
,
T. P.
Robinson
,
K. G.
Goulias
,
R. L.
Church
,
D.
Olaru
,
J.
Tapin
, and
R.
Han
, “
Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: A case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia
,”
J. Transp. Geogr.
, vol.
39
, pp.
111
120
,
2014
.
21.
L. P. Ă.
Curar
,
M.
Tudor
,
R.
Radu
, and
C. S.
Luiza
, “
Assessing Pedestrian Accessibility to Green Space using GIS
,” no.
42
, pp.
116
139
,
2014
.
22.
J. G.
Colclough
, “Modelling Pedestrian Accessibility Using GIS Techniques to Assess Development Sustainability,”
Eur. Transp. Conf.
, p.
9
pp.,
2009
.
23.
S.
Mavoa
,
K.
Witten
,
T.
McCreanor
, and
D.
O'Sullivan
, “
GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand
,”
J. Transp. Geogr.
, vol.
20
, no.
1
, pp.
15
22
,
2012
.
24.
E.
Ha
,
Y.
Joo
, and
C.
Jun
, “
An empirical study on sustainable walkability indices for transit-oriented development by using the analytic network process approach
,”
Int. J. Urban Sci.
, vol.
15
, no.
2
, pp.
137
146
,
2011
.
25.
S.
Kim
,
J.
Choi
, and
S.
Kim
, “
Roadside walking environments and major factors affecting pedestrian level of service
,”
Int. J. Urban Sci.
, vol.
17
, no.
3
, pp.
304
315
,
2013
.
26.
S. S.
Lee
,
S. S.
Lee
,
H.
Son
, and
Y.
Joo
, “
A New Approach for the Evaluation of the Walking Environment
,”
Int. J. Sustain. Transp.
, vol.
7
, no. December
2012
, pp.
238
260
,
2013
.
27.
M.
Reyer
,
S.
Fina
,
S.
Siedentop
, and
W.
Schlicht
, “
Walkability is only part of the story: Walking for transportation in Stuttgart, Germany
,”
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
, vol.
11
, no.
6
, pp.
5849
5865
,
2014
.
28.
F.
Peiravian
,
S.
Derrible
, and
F.
Ijaz
, “
Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI)
,”
J. Transp. Geogr.
, vol.
39
, pp.
73
84
,
2014
.
29.
F.
Moura
,
P.
Cambra
, and
A. B.
Gonçalves
, “
Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon
,”
Landsc. Urban Plan.
, vol.
157
, pp.
282
296
,
2017
.
30.
T. L.
Saaty
and
L. G.
Vargas
,
DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, oportunities, costs and risks
.
2006
.
31.
J.
Malczewski
and
C.
Rinner
,
Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science
.
2015
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.