The Item Response Theory (IRT) has become one of the most popular scoring frameworks for measurement data, frequently used in computerized adaptive testing, cognitively diagnostic assessment and test equating. According to Andrade et al. (2000), IRT can be defined as a set of mathematical models (Item Response Models – IRM) constructed to represent the probability of an individual giving the right answer to an item of a particular test. The number of Item Responsible Models available to measurement analysis has increased considerably in the last fifteen years due to increasing computer power and due to a demand for accuracy and more meaningful inferences grounded in complex data. The developments in modeling with Item Response Theory were related with developments in estimation theory, most remarkably Bayesian estimation with Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms (Patz & Junker, 1999). The popularity of Item Response Theory has also implied numerous overviews in books and journals, and many connections between IRT and other statistical estimation procedures, such as factor analysis and structural equation modeling, have been made repeatedly (Van der Lindem & Hambleton, 1997). As stated before the Item Response Theory covers a variety of measurement models, ranging from basic one-dimensional models for dichotomously and polytomously scored items and their multidimensional analogues to models that incorporate information about cognitive sub-processes which influence the overall item response process. The aim of this work is to introduce the main concepts associated with one-dimensional models of Item Response Theory, to specify the logistic models with one, two and three parameters, to discuss some properties of these models and to present the main estimation procedures.

1.
Andrade
,
D.F.
,
Tavares
,
H.R.
, &
Valle
,
R.C.
 Teoria da resposta ao Item: Conceitos e Aplicações. SINAPE.
Associação Brasileira de Estatística
,
2000
.
2.
Andrich
,
D.
 A rating formulation for ordered response categories.
Psychometrika
,
43
, pp.
561
573
,
1978
.
3.
Baker
,
F.B.
 The Basics of Item Response Theory (2nd edition).
ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation
,
USA
,
2001
.
4.
Birnbaum
,
A.
 Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee’s Ability. In
F.M.
Lord
&
M.R.
Novick
.
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
.
Reading, MA
:
Addison-Wesley
,
1968
.
5.
Bock
,
R. D.
Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories
.
Psychometrika
,
37
, pp.
29
51
,
1972
.
6.
Bock
,
R. D.
&
Zimowski
,
M. F.
 Multiple group IRT. In
Van der Linden
,
W.J.
&
Hambleton
,
R.K.
(Eds.)
Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory
.
New-York
:
Springer-Verlag
, pp.
433
488
,
1997
.
7.
Edelen
,
M.O.
&
Reeve
,
B.B.
Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement
Qual Life Res
16
:
5
,
2007
.
8.
Hambleton
,
R.K.
,
Swaminathan
,
H.
, &
Rogers
,
H.J.
 Fundamentals of Item Response Theory.
Sage Publications Inc
,
1991
.
9.
Hays
,
R.D.
,
Morales
,
L.S.
,
Reise
,
S.P.
Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st Century
.
Med Care. Sep
;
38
(
9 Suppl
):
II28
II42
,
2000
.
10.
Lord
,
F. M.
A theory of test scores (No. 7)
.
Psychometric Monograph
,
1952
.
11.
Masters
,
G. N.
A Rasch model for partial credit scoring
.
Psychometrika
,
47
, pp.
149
174
,
1982
.
12.
Muraki
,
E.
A generalized partial credit model: Application of EM algorithm
.
Applied Psychological Measurement
,
16
, pp.
159
176
,
1992
.
13.
Patz
,
R.J.
&
Jumker
,
B.W.
A straightforward approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models
.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
,
24
, pp.
146
178
,
1999
.
14.
Rasch
,
G.
 Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests.
Copenhagen
:
Danish Institute for Educational Research
,
1960
.
15.
Reise
,
SP
and
Revicki
,
D.A.
 Handbook of Item Response Theory Modeling.
Applications to Typical Performance Assessment
.
Taylor & Francis
,
2015
.
16.
Reise
SP
and
Waller
NG
.
Item response theory and clinical measurement
.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol.
5
:
27
48
,
2009
.
17.
Rupp
,
A.A.
Item Response Modelling with BILOG_MG and MULTILOG for Windows
.
International Journal of Testing
,
3
(
4
), pp.
365
384
,
2003
.
18.
Samejima
,
F. A.
Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores
.
Psychometric Monograph
,
17
,
1969
.
19.
Van der Linden
,
W.J.
&
Hambleton
,
R.K.
Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory
.
New-York
:
Springer-Verlag
,
1997
.
20.
Wright
,
B. D.
Sample-free test calibration and person measurement
.
Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems
.
Princeton, N. J.
:
Educational Testing Service
,
1968
.
21.
Zimowski
,
M. F.
,
Muraki
,
E.
,
Mislevy
,
R. J.
&
Bock
,
R.D.
BILOG-MG: Multiple-Group IRT Analysis and Test Maintenance for BinaryItems
.
Chicago
:
Scientific Software, Inc.
,
1996
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.