The demanding of assessment in learning process was impact by policy changes. Nowadays, assessment is not only emphasizing knowledge, but also skills and attitudes. However, in reality there are many obstacles in measuring them. This paper aimed to describe how to develop integrated assessment instrument and to verify instruments’ validity such as content validity and construct validity. This instrument development used test development model by McIntire. Development process data was acquired based on development test step. Initial product was observed by three peer reviewer and six expert judgments (two subject matter experts, two evaluation experts and two chemistry teachers) to acquire content validity. This research involved 376 first grade students of two Senior High Schools in Bantul Regency to acquire construct validity. Content validity was analyzed used Aiken’s formula. The verifying of construct validity was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis using SPSS ver 16.0. The result show that all constructs in integrated assessment instrument are asserted valid according to content validity and construct validity. Therefore, the integrated assessment instrument is suitable for measuring critical thinking abilities and science process skills of senior high school students on electrolyte solution matter.

1.
R.J.
Rezba
,
C.R.
Sprague
,
J.T.
McDonnough
and
J.J.
Matkins
,
Learning & Assessing Science Process Skills
Fifth Edition. (
Kendal/Hunt Publishing Company
,
Dubuque
,
2007
).
2.
Kemendikbud
,
Permendikbud Nomor 66 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan
(4 June
2013
).
3.
R.J.
Marzano
,
The Art of Science Teaching
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria
,
2007
), p.
59
.
4.
Z. H.
Ismail
and
I.
Jusoh
,
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E Asia
xxiv
,
67
77
(
2001
).
5.
A.C.
Marasigan
and
A.A.
Espinosa
,
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research
1
,
35
72
, (
2014
).
6.
Q.
Zhou
,
Q.
Huang
and
H.
Tian
,
Crative Education
4
,
40
45
(
2013
).
7.
M.
Duran
and
S.
Sendag
,
Creative Education
3
,
241
250
(
2012
).
8.
N.
Mahapoonyanont
,
R.
Krahomwong
,
D.
Kochakornjarupong
, and
W.
Rachasong
,
Procedia Social and Behavioral Science
3
,
434
438
(
2010
).
9.
Z.
Qing
,
S.
Ni
, and
T.
Hong
,
Procedia Social and Behavioral Science
2
,
4561
4570
(
2010
).
10.
B.
White
,
M.
Stains
,
M.
Escriu-Sune
,
E.
Medaglia
and
L.
Rostamnjad
,
Journal of College Science Teaching
40
,
102
107
(
2011
).
11.
Arslan
,
The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science
3
,
1
10
(
2015
).
12.
B.
Moore
and
T.
Stanley
,.
Critical Thinking and Formative Assessment
(
Eye on Education Inc
,
New York
,
2010
), pp.
16
21
.
13.
N.S.
Stephenson
and
N.P.
Sadler-McKnight
,
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
17
,
72
79
(
2016
).
14.
T.
Bowel
and
G.
Kemp
,
Critical thinking: A concise guide
(
Routledge
,
London
,
2002
), p.
6
.
15.
R.A.
Rauf
,
M.S.
Rasul
,
A.N.
Mansor
,
Z.
Othman
and
N.
Lyndon
,
Asian Social Science
9
,
47
57
(
2013
).
16.
J.
Li
and
D.
Klahr
, “The psychology of scientific thinking: Implications for science teaching and learning,”in
Teaching Science in the 21st Century
, edited by
J.
Rhoton
, &
P.
Shane
(
NSTA Press
,
Arlington
,
2006
), p.
2
.
17.
W.
Harlen
,
Assessment in Education
6
,
129
140
(
1999
).
18.
J.
Huppert
,
S.M.
Lomask
and
R.
Lazarorcitz
,
Journal of Science Education
24
,
803
821
(
2002
).
19.
A.
Aydin
,
International Journal of Education and Practice
1
,
5
1
63
(
2013
).
20.
C.
Keil
,
J.
Haney
and
J.
Zoffel
,
Electronic Journal of Science Education
13
,
1
18
(
2009
).
21.
B.
Subali
,
Cakrawala Pendidikan
xxx
,
130
144
(
2011
).
22.
M.M.
Sheeba
,
Educationia Confab
2
,
108
123
(
2013
).
23.
U.
Zoller
,
Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe
2
,
9
17
(
2001
).
24.
A.C.
Austin
,
H.
Ben-Daat
,
M.
Zhu
,
R.
Atkinson
,
N.
Barrows
and
I.R.
Gould
,
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
1
,
168
178
(
2015
).
25.
D.
Saribaz
and
H.
Bayram
,
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
1
,
61
72
(
2009
).
26.
C.
Tosun
and
Y.
Taskesenligil
,
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
14
,
36
50
(
2013
).
27.
L.R.
Aiken
,
Educational and Psychological Measurement
40
,
955
959
(
1980
).
28.
L.R.
Aiken
,
Educational and Psychological Measurement
45
,
131
142
(
1985
).
29.
T.
Utomo
and
K.
Ruijter
,.
Peningkatan dan pengembangan Pendidikan
(
Gramedia Pustaka Utama
,
Jakarta
,
1994
), p.
60
.
30.
K.V.
Beek
and
L.
Louters
,
Journal of Chemical Education
68
,
389
392
(
1991
).
31.
A.S.
Beavers
,
J.W.
Lounsbury
and
J.K.
Richards
,
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
18
,
1
13
(
2013
).
32.
F.
Lord
,
Application of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems
(
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Publisher
,
Mahwah
,
1980
), p.
20
.
33.
H.
Retnawati
,
Teori Respon Butir Dan Penerapannya
(
Parama Publishing
,
Yogyakarta
,
2014
, p.
1
.
34.
R,K
,
Hambleton
and
H.
Swaminathan
,
Item Response Theory
(
Kluwer Inc
,
Boston
,
1985
), p.
16
.
35.
R.K.
Hambleton
,
H.
Swaminathan
and
H.J.
Rogers
,
Fundamentals of Item Response Theory
(
Sage Publications Inc
,
California
,
1991
), p.
56
.
36.
M.
Wiberg
,
Classical Test Theory vs Item Response Theory
(
Umea University Press
,
Umea
,
2004
), p.
5
.
37.
M.D.
Reckase
,
Journal of Educational Statistics
4
,
207
230
(
1979
).
38.
N.
Smits
,
P.
Cuijpers
and
A.
van Straten
,
Psychiatry Research
188
,
147
155
(
2011
).
39.
Q.
Wu
,
Z.
Zhang
,
Y.
Song
,
Y.
Zang
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
F.
Zhang
,
International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology
5
,
209
216
(
2013
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.