Sea‐launched cruise missiles (SLCMs) present some particularly striking problems for both national security and arms control. These small, dual‐purpose, difficult to detect weapons present some formidable challenges for verification in any scheme that attempts to limit rather than eliminate them. Conventionally armed SLCMs offer to the navies of both superpowers important offensive and defensive capabilities. Nuclear armed, long‐range, land‐attack SLCMs, on the other hand, seem to pose destabilizing threats and otherwise have questionable value, despite strong US support for extensive deployment of them. If these weapons are not constrained, their deployment could circumvent gains which might be made in agreements directly reducing of strategic nuclear weapons. This paper reviews the technology and planned deployments of SLCMs, the verification schemes which have been discussed and are being investigated to try to deal with the problem, and examines the proposed need for and possible uses of SLCMs. It presents an overview of the problem technically, militarily, and politically.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
15 December 1988
Nuclear Arms Technologies in the 1990s
16-17 April 1988
Washington, DC, USA
Research Article|
December 15 1988
Sea‐launched cruise missiles: Technology, missions, & arms control verification Available to Purchase
Richard A. Scribner
Richard A. Scribner
School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, and Center for International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard A. Scribner
School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, and Center for International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University
AIP Conf. Proc. 178, 376–398 (1988)
Citation
Richard A. Scribner; Sea‐launched cruise missiles: Technology, missions, & arms control verification. AIP Conf. Proc. 15 December 1988; 178 (1): 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.37835
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
12
Views
Citing articles via
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
Related Content
Using Elementary Mechanics to Estimate the Maximum Range of ICBMs
Phys. Teach. (April 2018)
On limiting technology by negotiated agreement
AIP Conf. Proc. (October 1983)
Strategic Defense Initiative: The Politics and Science of Weapons in Space
Physics Today (June 1985)
Nondestructive inspection of a composite missile launcher
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2012)