This study presents a comparison of two optical concentrators: A crossed Compound Parabolic Concentrator (CCPC) and a pyramidused as a secondary optical element with and without the primary stage, a Fresnel lens. Results show that the optical efficiency is higher in the case of the pyramid if used alone, andevidently decreases when a primary stage is added. Compared to CCPC, the pyramid as secondary optical element is more efficient. Regarding the size of the elements, it is found thatthe length and the inlet radius of each optical element decrease when the acceptance angle increases. The CPC presents the larger inlet radius and the longer length for as long as the acceptance angle is less than 45°, beyond this value, the two lengths are equal.

1.
E.
WILLIAMSON
,
1952
,
Cone Channel Condenser Optics, the optical society of America
,
42
,
10
.
2.
Nazmi
Sellami
«
Design and characterisation of a novel translucent solar concentrator
» Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Institute of Mechanical, Process and Energy Engineering School of Engineering and Physical Sciences Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburgh
,
United Kingdom
June
2013
.
3.
Hisham A.
Maliek
Optical Design Optimization for Indoor Solar Illumination
”,
Eng. &Tech. Journal
, Vol.
32
, Part (B), No.
3
,
2014
4.
A.
Plesniak
,
V.
Garboushian
,
M.
Liu
,
R.
Gordon
, and
W.
Bagienski
, “
An introduction to the Amonix 8700 solar power generator
,”
Proc. SPIE
8821
,
88210D
(
2013
).
5.
Z.
Zhuang
,
F.
Yu
,
Optimization design of hybrid Fresnel-based concentrator for generating uniformity irradiance with the broad solar spectrum
,
Optics &LaserTechnology
60
(
2014
)
27
33
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.