Design of offshore drilling equipment is a task that involves not only analysis of strict machine specifications and safety requirements but also consideration of changeable weather conditions and harsh environment. These challenges call for a multidisciplinary approach and make the design process complex. Various modeling software products are currently available to aid design engineers in their effort to test and redesign equipment before it is manufactured. However, given the number of available modeling tools and methods, the choice of the proper modeling methodology becomes not obvious and – in some cases – troublesome. Therefore, we present a comparative analysis of two popular approaches used in modeling and simulation of mechanical systems: multibody and analytical modeling. A gripper arm of the offshore vertical pipe handling machine is selected as a case study for which both models are created. In contrast to some other works, the current paper shows verification of both systems by benchmarking their simulation results against each other. Such criteria as modeling effort and results accuracy are evaluated to assess which modeling strategy is the most suitable given its eventual application.

1.
T. O.
Andersen
, and
M. R.
Hansen
, “
Automated sizing procedure of servo-driven robot for pallettes handling
,” in
Mechanical Engineering Congress and R & D Expo, 2004 ASME International
,
2004
, pp.
1
6
.
2.
T. H.
Langer
,
T. K.
Iversen
,
O. Ø.
Mouritsen
,
M. K.
Ebbesen
, and
M. R.
Hansen
,
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
47
,
621
630
(
2013
).
3.
Y.
Tazaki
, and
T.
Suzuki
,
Robotics, IEEE Transactions on
30
,
1227
1234
(
2014
).
4.
W.
Pawlus
,
M.
Choux
,
G.
Hovland
,
S.
Øydna
, and
M. R.
Hansen
, “
Modeling and simulation of an offshore pipe handling machine
,” in
Simulation and Modeling, 2014 SIMS 55th Conference on
,
2014
, pp.
277
284
.
5.
J.
Hao
,
L.
Yancong
,
Z.
Yanting
,
L.
Zhendong
, and
W.
Guangbin
, “
Research on new drill string heave compensation system for floating drilling platform
,” in
Fluid Power and Mechatronics (FPM), 2011 International Conference on
,
2011
, pp.
791
795
.
6.
A.
Albert
,
O.
Aamo
,
J.-M.
Godhavn
, and
A.
Pavlov
,
Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on
23
,
813
819
(
2015
).
7.
W.-H.
Ding
,
H.
Deng
,
Q.-M.
Li
, and
Y.-M.
Xia
,
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
30
,
421
431
(
2014
).
8.
J. G.
de Jalón
, and
E.
Bayo
,
Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems
,
Springer Verlag
,
New York
,
1994
.
9.
P.
Flores
, and
J.
Ambrósio
,
Computers & Structures
82
,
1359
1369
(
2004
).
10.
P. E.
Nikravesh
,
Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems
,
Prentice Hall
,
Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey
,
1988
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.