This work presents mass reconstruction of galaxies cluster from strong lens analysis for Abell 2219 (z = 0.225), RXC J2248,7-4431 (z = 0.348), and SDSS J1004+4112 (z = 0.68) using parametric model sofware for strong gravitational lensing, glafic (Oguri 2010). We use assumptions of point source and source-plane approximation for minimization. We find that our parametric model well reproduces the positions of multiply imaged galaxies and quasars and time delays between quasar images. We find that the best-fit centroid of the dark halo (NFW) is quite consistent with the distribution of gas from observed X-ray. Radius enclosed mass profile and mass profile from hidrostatic assumption on distribution of gas from X-ray agree quite well with each other, including the radial slopes of the profiles with average discrepancies, Mlens/MX = 1.52 on the outer radius of images. Existence of dominant galaxy associate with compactness of cluster as lens. We find increasing of fraction of galaxies morphology from distribution of cluster members increase with redshift.

1.
K. W.
Cavagnolo
 et al.,
ApJS
182
,
12
32
(
2009
).
2.
N.
Inada
 et al.,
PASJ
57
,
L7
L10
(
2005
).
3.
J.
Fohlmeister
 et al.,
ApJ
662
,
62
(
2007
).
4.
J.
Fohlmeister
,
C. S.
Kochanek
,
E. E.
Falco
,
C. W.
Morgan
and
J.
Wambsganss
,
ApJ
676
,
761
(
2008
).
5.
Y. P.
Jing
and
Y.
Suto
,
ApJ
529
,
L69
(
2000
).
6.
C. R.
Keeton
,
preprint (astro-ph/0102341)
(
2001b
).
7.
C. S.
Kochanek
,
ApJ
373
,
354
(
1991
).
8.
A.
Monna
 et al.,
MNRAS
438
,
1417
(
2013
).
9.
M.
Oguri
,
PASJ
62
,
1017
1024
(
2010
).
10.
M.
Oguri
 et al.,
MNRAS
420
,
3213
3239
(
2012
).
11.
N.
Ota
 et al.,
ApJ
647
,
215
221
(
2006
).
12.
A. L.
Serra
 et al.,
A&A
524
,
A16
(
2010
).
13.
I.
Smail
 et al.,
MNRAS
277
,
1
10
(
1995
).
14.
I.
Strateva
 et al.,
The Astronomical Journal
Vol.
122
,
Issue 4
,
1861
1874
(
2001
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.