Toy model is a new approximation in predicting fission yield distribution. Toy model assumes nucleus as an elastic toy consist of marbles. The number of marbles represents the number of nucleons, A. This toy nucleus is able to imitate the real nucleus properties. In this research, the toy nucleons are only influenced by central force. A heavy toy nucleus induced by a toy nucleon will be split into two fragments. These two fission fragments are called fission yield. In this research, energy entanglement is neglected. Fission process in toy model is illustrated by two Gaussian curves intersecting each other. There are five Gaussian parameters used in this research. They are scission point of the two curves (Rc), mean of left curve (μL) and mean of right curve (μR), deviation of left curve (σL) and deviation of right curve (σR). The fission yields distribution is analyses based on Monte Carlo simulation. The result shows that variation in σ or µ can significanly move the average frequency of asymmetry fission yields. This also varies the range of fission yields distribution probability. In addition, variation in iteration coefficient only change the frequency of fission yields. Monte Carlo simulation for fission yield calculation using toy model successfully indicates the same tendency with experiment results, where average of light fission yield is in the range of 90<A<100 and average of heavy fission yield is in about 135<A<145.

1.
E. F.
Mitenkova
and
N.V.
Novikov
,
Effect of Fission Products Yield Library on the Calculation of the Nuclide Composition of Fuel in Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors
(
Atomic Energy
, Vol.
III
. No.
2
,
December 2011
), pp.
99
106
.
2.
Suwoto
and
Zuhair
,
Study and Preliminary Observation on Nuclear Data Requirement for Nuclear Reactor IV Generation (Gen-IV)
. (
SIMETRI
,
Indonesian Journal of Physics
, Vol.
1
No.
1(B)
May 2012
), pp.
18
25
.
3.
W.
Loveland
,
D.J.
Morrissey
, and
G.T.
Seaborg
,
Modern Nuclear Chemistry
, (
John Willey & Sons, Inc.
,
Hoboken, New Jersey
,
2006
).
4.
J.I.
Katakura
,
A Systematics Of Fission Product Mass Yields With 5 Gaussian Functions
.
Tokaimura, Nakagun, Ibarakiken
:
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute
, (
2003
).
5.
A. C.
Wahl
,
Systematics of Fission-Product Yields
, (
Los Alamos National Laboratory University of California
,
California
,
2002
).
6.
M.
Ohta
,
S.
Tatsuda
,
T.
Hashizume
,
K.
Yamamoto
,
T.
Wada
,
K.
Sumiyoshi
, et al. (
2007
). Systematic study for the mass distribution of fission fragments in the neutron rich region.
International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
(hal.
359
362
).
Osaka
:
EDP Sciences
.
7.
U.
Brosa
,
S.
Grossmann
, and
A.
Muller
,
Nuclear Scission
, (
Elsevier Science
,
Marburg
,
1990
).
8.
P.
Moller
,
D. G.
Madland
,
A. J.
Slerk
, and
A.
Iwamoto
,
Nuclear Fission Modes And Fragment Mass Asymmetries In A Five-Dimensional Deformation Space
.
NATURE
VOL
409
www.nature.com, (
15 February 2001
), pp.
785
790
.
9.
W.
Younes
, and
D.
Gogny
,
Fragment Yields Calculated in a Time-Dependent Microscopic Theory of Fission
. (
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
US
,
2012
)
10.
R.
Kurniadi
,
S.
Viridi
, and
A.
Waris
,
Fission Toy Model: The Uniform Distribution of Random Particle Position
.
Journal of Applied Physical Science International
,
ISSN No.: 2348-0130
, Vol:
2
, Issue:
3
, (
2015
), pp.
120
124
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.