New noise reduction method for reducing dose of CT scans has been proposed. The new method is expected to address the major problems in the noise reduction algorithm, i.e. the decreasing in the spatial resolution of the image. The proposed method was developed by combining adaptive Wiener filtering and edge detection algorithms. The first step, the image was filtered with a Wiener filter. Separately, edge detection operation performed on the original image using the Prewitt method. The next step, a new image was generated based on the edge detection operation. At the edge area, the image was taken from the original image, while at the non-edge area, the image was taken from the image that had been filtered with a Wiener filter. The new method was tested on a CT image of the spatial resolution phantom, which was scanned by different current-time multiplication, namely 80, 130 and 200 mAs, while other exposure factors were kept in constant conditions. The spatial resolution phantom consists of six sets of bar pattern made of plexi-glass and separated at some distance by water. The new image quality assessed from the amount of noise and the magnitude of spatial resolution. Noise was calculated by determining the standard deviation of the homogeneous regions, while the spatial resolution was assessed by observation of the area sets of the bar pattern. In addition, to evaluate the performance of this new method has also been tested on patient CT images. From the measurements, the new method can reduce the noise to an average 64.85%, with a spatial resolution does not decrease significantly. Visually, the third set bar on the image phantom (the distance between the bar 1.0 mm) can still be distinguished, as well as on the original image. Meanwhile, if the image is only processed using Wiener filter, the second set bar (the distance between the bar 1.3 mm) are distinguishable. Testing this new method to patient image, its results in relatively the same. Thus, using this new method, it provides the potential for dose reduction more than 60%.

1.
J. A.
Bauhs
,
T. J.
Vrieze
,
A. N.
Primak
,
M. R.
Bruesewitz
, and
C. H.
McCollough
,
RadioGraphics
,
28
,
245
253
(
2008
)
2.
D. J.
Brenner
,
C. D.
Elliston
,
E. J.
Hal
, and
W. E.
Berdon
,
AJR
,
176
,
289
296
(
2000
)
3.
W. A.
Kalender
,
Phys. Med. Biol.
59
,
R129
R150
(
2014
)
4.
S. A.
Sohaib
,
P. D.
Peppercorn
,
J. A.
Horrocks
,
M. H.
Keene
,
G. S.
Kenyon
, and
R. H.
Reznek
,
Br. J. Radiol.
74
,
157
161
(
2001
)
5.
A. J.
Van der Molen
,
R. M. S.
Joemai
, and
J.
Geileijns
,
Physica Medica
,
28
,
319
326
(
2012
),
6.
L.
Yu
,
M. R.
Bruesewitz
,
K. B.
Thomas
,
J. G.
Fletcher
,
J. M.
Kofler
, and
C. H.
McCollough
,
RadioGraphics
,
31
,
835
848
(
2011
)
7.
A. K.
Hara
,
R. G.
Paden
,
A.C.
Silva
,
J. L.
Kujak
,
H. J.
Lawder
, and
W.
Pavlicek
,
AJR
,
193
,
764
771
(
2009
)
8.
M. K.
Kalra
,
C.
Wittram
,
M. M.
Maher
,
A.
Sharma
,
G. B.
Avinash
,
K.
Karau
,
T. L.
Toth
,
E.
Halpern
,
S.
Saini
, and
J.
Shepard
,
Radiology
,
228
,
257
264
(
2003
)
9.
G.
Dougherty
,
Digital Image Processing for Medical Applications
, (
Cambridge University Press
,
2009
) pp.
246
258
10.
B.
Shinde
and
A. R.
Dani
,
IJERA
,
2
,
311
316
(
2012
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.