Recently, Monte Carlo (MC) calculation method has reported as the most accurate method of predicting dose distributions in radiotherapy. The MC code system (especially DOSXYZnrc) has been used to investigate the different voxel (volume elements) sizes effect on the accuracy of dose distributions. To investigate this effect on dosimetry parameters, calculations were made with three different voxel sizes. The effects were investigated with dose distribution calculations for seven voxel sizes: 1 × 1 × 0.1 cm3, 1 × 1 × 0.5 cm3, and 1 × 1 × 0.8 cm3. The 1 × 109 histories were simulated in order to get statistical uncertainties of 2%. This simulation takes about 9-10 hours to complete. Measurements are made with field sizes 10 × 10 cm2 for the 6 MV photon beams with Gaussian intensity distribution FWHM 0.1 cm and SSD 100.1 cm. MC simulated and measured dose distributions in a water phantom. The output of this simulation i.e. the percent depth dose and dose profile in dmax from the three sets of calculations are presented and comparisons are made with the experiment data from TTSH (Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore) in 0-5 cm depth. Dose that scored in voxels is a volume averaged estimate of the dose at the center of a voxel. The results in this study show that the difference between Monte Carlo simulation and experiment data depend on the voxel size both for percent depth dose (PDD) and profile dose. PDD scan on Z axis (depth) of water phantom, the big difference obtain in the voxel size 1 × 1 × 0.8 cm3 about 17%. In this study, the profile dose focused on high gradient dose area. Profile dose scan on Y axis and the big difference get in the voxel size 1 × 1 × 0.1 cm3 about 12%. This study demonstrated that the arrange voxel in Monte Carlo simulation becomes important.

1.
I.
Kawrakow
and
D. W. O.
Rogers
,
The EGSnrc Code System: Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport
, (
National Research Council of Canada
,
Ottawa
,
2013
), pp.
16
.
2.
I.G.E.
Dirgayussa
,
S.
Yani
,
M.F.
Rhani
,
F.
Haryanto
, “Commissioning process of Varian Clinac iX”,
AIP Procedding Conference
(
Institut Teknologi Bandung
,
Bandung
,
2014
), pp.
1
4
.
3.
I. J.
Das
,
C.W.
Cheng
,
R.J.
Watts
,
A.
Ahnesjö
,
J.
Gibbons
,
X.A.
Li
,
J.
Lowenstein
,
R.K.
Mitra
,
W.E.
Simon
,
T. C.
Zhu
,
Med. Phys.
35
(
9
),
4186
4215
, (
2008
).
4.
E.
Spezi
,
D.G.
Lewis
and
C.W.
Smith
,
Phys. Med. Biol.
47
,
4223
4232
(
2002
).
5.
A.D.
Wu
,
Y.C.
Wu
,
S.X.
Tao
,
J. H.
Zhang
, “
Effect of CT Image-Based Voxel Size On Monte Carlo Dose Calculation
” in
Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference
,
Proceddings of 2005 IEEE
(
Sanghai
,
China
,
2005
), pp.
6449
6451
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.