Changes in the circumstances behind in situ temperature measurements often lead to shifts in individual station records that can lead to over or under-estimates of the local and regional temperature trends. Since these shifts are comparable in magnitude to climate change signals, homogeneity "corrections" are necessary to make the records suitable for climate analysis. To quantify the effectiveness of surface temperature homogenization in the United States, a randomized perturbed ensemble of the pairwise homogenization algorithm was run against a suite of benchmark analogs to real monthly temperature data from the United States Cooperative Observer Program, which includes the subset of stations known as the United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN). Results indicate that all randomized versions of the algorithm consistently produce homogenized data closer to the true climate signal in the presence of widespread systematic shifts in the data. When applied to the real-world observations, the randomized ensemble reinforces previous understanding that the two dominant sources of shifts in the U.S. temperature records are caused by changes to time of observation (spurious cooling in minimum and maximum) and conversion to electronic resistance thermometers (spurious cooling in maximum and warming in minimum). Trend bounds defined by the ensemble output indicate that maximum temperature trends are positive for the past 30, 50 and 100 years, and that these maximums contain pervasive negative shifts that cause the unhomogenized (raw) trends to fall below the lowest of the ensemble of homogenized trends. Moreover, because the residual impact of undetected/uncorrected shifts in the homogenized analogs is one-tailed when the imposed shifts have a positive or negative sign preference, it is likely that maximum temperature trends have been underestimated in the real-world homogenized temperature data from the USHCN. Trends for minimum temperature are also positive over the three periods, but the trend bounds produced by the 100 algorithm runs encompass trends from the unhomogenized data.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
11 September 2013
TEMPERATURE: ITS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL IN SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY, VOLUME 8: Proceedings of the Ninth International Temperature Symposium
19–23 March 2012
Los Angeles, California
Research Article|
September 11 2013
Benchmarking the performance of pairwise homogenization of surface temperatures in the United States
M. J. Menne;
M. J. Menne
NOAA's National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC,
USA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. N. Williams;
C. N. Williams
NOAA's National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC,
USA
Search for other works by this author on:
P. W. Thorne
P. W. Thorne
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen,
Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
AIP Conf. Proc. 1552, 1072–1077 (2013)
Citation
M. J. Menne, C. N. Williams, P. W. Thorne; Benchmarking the performance of pairwise homogenization of surface temperatures in the United States. AIP Conf. Proc. 11 September 2013; 1552 (1): 1072–1077. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821423
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00
5
Views
Citing articles via
Related Content
An improved correlation method for determining the period of a torsion pendulum
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (September 2008)
High‐current plasma lens: New results and applications
Rev Sci Instrum (March 1996)
Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data
AIP Conference Proceedings (September 2013)
New Type of Molecular Mass Gauge for Use with Small Gas Samples
Rev Sci Instrum (November 2003)