This study aims to explore mathematics teachers’ levels of use of Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) in teaching mathematics. The Levels of Use (LoU) is one of the dimensions of the Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) which focuses on knowledge and skill of the individual. It is important to know about individual LoU because it helps to formulate strategic planning for the advancement of mathematics’ teachers in GSP. 40 mathematics teachers from 40 secondary schools in Kota Setar District who attended a mathematics course were given the adapted questionnaire: Level of Use of Innovation (LoUQ), but only 31 of them completed and returned the questionnaire. The data indicated that 24 (77.4%) mathematics teachers are nonusers of Geometer’s Sketchpad where 13 of them are at level 0 (Non-Use), eight are at level I (Orientation) and three at level II (Preparation). The other seven mathematics teachers are user of GSP at levels III (two teachers), level IVA (three) and level V (two). Varieties of reasons were given for not using the software such as no equipment support, lack of confidence in preparing the lessons and lack of GSP exposure. The paper will conclude with some suggestions to increase the levels of use of GSP among mathematics teachers.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
22 April 2013
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES: Research in Mathematical Sciences: A Catalyst for Creativity and Innovation
18–20 December 2012
Palm Garden Hotel, Putrajaya, Malaysia
Research Article|
April 22 2013
Mathematics teachers’ levels of use of geometer’s sketchpad: Where is the pinnacle? Available to Purchase
Kalsom Binti Saidin;
Kalsom Binti Saidin
School of Science Education Center, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang,
Malaysia
Search for other works by this author on:
Lim Chap Sam
Lim Chap Sam
School of Science Education Center, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang,
Malaysia
Search for other works by this author on:
Kalsom Binti Saidin
Lim Chap Sam
School of Science Education Center, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang,
Malaysia
AIP Conf. Proc. 1522, 285–291 (2013)
Citation
Kalsom Binti Saidin, Lim Chap Sam; Mathematics teachers’ levels of use of geometer’s sketchpad: Where is the pinnacle?. AIP Conf. Proc. 22 April 2013; 1522 (1): 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4801135
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Classification data mining with Laplacian Smoothing on Naïve Bayes method
Ananda P. Noto, Dewi R. S. Saputro
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Related Content
A survey on the effectiveness of using GeoGebra software towards lecturers' conceptual knowledge and procedural mathematics
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2013)
Development of smart triankit as teaching aids on the topic of solution of triangles in additional mathematics form 4
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 2023)
Effect of teaching mathematics using GeoGebra on students’ with dissimilar spatial visualisation
AIP Conf. Proc. (October 2015)
Development of peri-calcup board kit as a form one teaching aids for perimeter topics
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 2023)
Development of tarsia puzzle for the topic of translation and reflection in form two mathematics
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2023)