This works presents the validation of a custom‐made software, designed and developed in Matlab, intended for routine evaluation of detective quantum efficiency DQE, according to algorithms described in the IEC 62220‐1‐2 standard. DQE, normalized noise power spectrum NNPS and pre‐sampling modulation transfer function MTF were calculated from RAW images from a GE Senographe DS (FineView disabled) and a Siemens Novation system. Calculated MTF is in close agreement with results obtained with alternative codes: MTF_tool (Maidment), ImageJ plug‐in (Pérez‐Ponce) and MIQuaELa (Ayala). Overall agreement better than ≈90% was found in MTF; the largest differences were observed at frequencies close to the Nyquist limit. For the measurement of NNPS and DQE, agreement is similar to that obtained in the MTF. These results suggest that the developed software can be used with confidence for image quality assessment.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
7 December 2010
ELEVENTH MEXICAN SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL PHYSICS
19–22 March 2010
Mexico City, (Mexico)
Research Article|
December 07 2010
Validation of a Custom‐made Software for DQE Assessment in Mammography Digital Detectors
L. Ayala‐Domínguez;
L. Ayala‐Domínguez
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 20‐364, 01000 DF, Mexico
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Pérez‐Ponce;
H. Pérez‐Ponce
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 20‐364, 01000 DF, Mexico
Search for other works by this author on:
M. E. Brandan
M. E. Brandan
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 20‐364, 01000 DF, Mexico
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Ayala‐Domínguez
H. Pérez‐Ponce
M. E. Brandan
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 20‐364, 01000 DF, Mexico
AIP Conf. Proc. 1310, 39–43 (2010)
Citation
L. Ayala‐Domínguez, H. Pérez‐Ponce, M. E. Brandan; Validation of a Custom‐made Software for DQE Assessment in Mammography Digital Detectors. AIP Conf. Proc. 7 December 2010; 1310 (1): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3531603
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Related Content
Comparison of two full field digital mammography systems: Image quality and radiation dose
AIP Conf. Proc. (August 2018)
Contrast-enhanced digital mammography and other techniques based on image subtraction
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2016)
Spectrometric characterization of amorphous silicon PIN detectors
AIP Conf. Proc. (October 2000)
Generation of a mammographic phantom using an inkjet printer and radiopaque ink
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2019)
A Study on Dual‐Energy Subtraction in Digital Mammography
AIP Conf. Proc. (September 2004)