We have surveyed what various groups of instructors and students think students should learn in introductory physics. We started with a Delphi Study based on interviews with experts, then developed orthogonal responses to “what should we teach non‐physics majors besides the current syllabus topics?” AAPT attendees, atomic researchers, and PERC08 attendees were asked for their selections. All instructors rated “sense‐making of the answer” very highly and expert problem solving highly. PERers favored epistemology over problem solving, and atomic researchers “physics comes from a few principles.” Students at three colleges had preferences anti‐aligned with their teachers, preferring more modern topics, and the relationship of physics to everyday life and also to society (the only choice with instructor agreement), but not problem solving or sense‐making. Conclusion ♯1: we must show students how old physics is relevant to their world. Conclusion ♯2: significant course reform must start by reaching consensus on what to teach and how to hold students’ interest (then discuss techniques to teach it).
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
5 November 2009
2009 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE
29–30 July 2009
Ann Arbor (MI)
Research Article|
November 05 2009
What Else (Besides the Syllabus) Should Students Learn in Introductory Physics?
David E. Pritchard;
David E. Pritchard
aPhysics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Analia Barrantes;
Analia Barrantes
aPhysics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian R. Belland
Brian R. Belland
bDepartment of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84341
Search for other works by this author on:
David E. Pritchard
a
Analia Barrantes
a
Brian R. Belland
b
aPhysics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139
bDepartment of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84341
AIP Conf. Proc. 1179, 43–46 (2009)
Citation
David E. Pritchard, Analia Barrantes, Brian R. Belland; What Else (Besides the Syllabus) Should Students Learn in Introductory Physics?. AIP Conf. Proc. 5 November 2009; 1179 (1): 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266749
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Related Content
The role of stages in designing English syllabus development for the students of electrical engineering study program
AIP Conf. Proc. (September 2017)
The development of problem based learning (PBL) electronic module on human digestive system materials to improve critical thinking skills and cognitive learning outcomes
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2024)
Syllabus for the One-Year College Course in Physical Science
Am. J. Phys. (October 1957)
Need analysis of the development of a self assessment based clinic supervision model
AIP Conf. Proc. (August 2023)