Here we provide a capsule summary of key observations showing that adverse effects can be reduced and stone breakage outcomes can be improved by the choice of the treatment protocol used in SWL. The take home message is—technique in lithotripsy can be used to significant advantage. SW‐rate is key, and so is the sequence of SW delivery. Patient studies have shown that stone breakage is significantly improved at 60SW/min compared to a rate of 120SW/min, and laboratory experiments with pigs show that acute SWL injury to the kidney can be reduced dramatically by further slowing the SW firing rate to 30SW/min. The sequence of SW administration has a profound effect on the kidney, and renal injury is significantly reduced when the treatment protocol incorporates a priming dose of SW’s followed by a brief pause before treatment is resumed. Continued developments in lithotripsy technology are welcome and will hopefully lead to improved SWL systems. Current experience suggests, however, that technology is not a substitute for expert technique, and attention to the fundamentals of SW delivery is essential to achieve the best possible outcomes regardless of the lithotripter at hand.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
18 September 2008
RENAL STONE DISEASE 2: 2nd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium
17–18 April 2008
Indianapolis (Indiana)
Research Article|
September 18 2008
Treatment Protocols to Reduce Injury and Improve Stone Breakage in SWL Available to Purchase
James A. McAteer;
James A. McAteer
aDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5120, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew P. Evan;
Andrew P. Evan
aDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5120, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Bret A. Connors;
Bret A. Connors
aDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5120, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Yuri A. Pishchalnikov;
Yuri A. Pishchalnikov
aDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5120, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
James C. Williams;
James C. Williams
Jr.
aDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5120, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
James E. Lingeman
James E. Lingeman
bMethodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
James A. McAteer
a
Andrew P. Evan
a
Bret A. Connors
a
Yuri A. Pishchalnikov
a
James C. Williams
a
James E. Lingeman
b
aDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5120, USA
bMethodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
AIP Conf. Proc. 1049, 243–248 (2008)
Citation
James A. McAteer, Andrew P. Evan, Bret A. Connors, Yuri A. Pishchalnikov, James C. Williams, James E. Lingeman; Treatment Protocols to Reduce Injury and Improve Stone Breakage in SWL. AIP Conf. Proc. 18 September 2008; 1049 (1): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2998030
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Classification data mining with Laplacian Smoothing on Naïve Bayes method
Ananda P. Noto, Dewi R. S. Saputro
Related Content
Shock Wave Injury to the Kidney in SWL: Review and Perspective
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2007)
Location of coupling defects influences stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2011)
Acoustic coupling can be problematic in shock wave lithotripsy
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2006)
Effect of the Test Basket on Lithotripter Shock Waves, Cavitation Field, and Stone Breakage
AIP Conf. Proc. (September 2008)
Ed Carstensen, advisor and mentor to the shockwave lithotripsy program project group
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2017)