The climate crisis defines the present. The world’s living and nonliving entities face a devastating array of impacts from the myriad tentacles of rapid human-generated climate change.1,2 Science has positioned itself front and center in the fight against the climate crisis, through proposals for technological solutions ranging from feasible (e.g., electric cars, renewable energy), yet often problematic,3,4 to grandiose and ill conceived (e.g., large-scale geo-engineering proposals to reduce incident sunlight, arbitrary tree planting for “carbon offsets”).5 However, science rarely questions its own role in creating and propagating the current climate crisis, often greenwashing its solutions,6 which fail to genuinely address the issues in sustainable ways,7 or are well meaning but ultimately damaging.8 Further, widely held uncritical notions of “objectivity”9–11 and Eurocentrism12 in science often lead to climate technoscientific saviorism.13 In this article, we contend that critical climate education through justice-oriented narratives...

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.