Traditional high-stakes summative assessments—timed, in-class exams accounting for a large percentage of the term’s overall grade—have often received criticism from the educational community. Such assessments tend to prize a particular “narrow bundle of skills,” and have been shown in some contexts to produce disparate outcomes between different demographic groups. Alternative low-stakes assessments (assignments with significantly less impact on the overall grade) have shown potential to improve student engagement and close demographic gaps. At the same time, principles from physics education research suggest to us that students may benefit from the challenge of writing their own physics problems. Conjoining these ideas, we document an assignment (“The Problem Project”) in which students were asked to create and solve a problem of their own design, as an alternative form of assessment, and provide exploratory research into its equity impacts.

1.
Peter T.
Knight
, “
Summative assessment in higher education: practices in disarray
,”
Stud. Higher Educ.
27
,
275
286
(
2002
).
2.
Leon M.
Lederman
and
Ray A.
Burnstein
, “
Alternative approaches to high-stakes testing
,”
Phi Delta Kappan
87
,
429
432
(
2006
).
3.
Michael G.
Gunzenhauser
, “
High-stakes testing and the default philosophy of education
,”
Theory into Pract.
42
,
51
58
(
2003
).
4.
Analia
Schlosser
,
Zvika
Neeman
, and
Yigal
Attali
, “
Differential performance in high versus low stakes tests: evidence from the GRE test
,”
Econ. J.
129
,
2916
2948
(
2019
).
5.
Chad
Rohrbacher
and
Richard
Pearson
, “
Quarantining high-stakes assessments in an introductory physics class
,”
Intersection
2
,
17619
(
2020
).
6.
Alysa
Malespina
and
Chandralekha
Singh
, “
Gender differences in test anxiety and self-efficacy: Why instructors should emphasize low-stakes formative assessments in physics courses
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
43
,
035701
(
2022
).
7.
Tobias
Espinosa
et al, “
Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team-and project-based introductory physics class
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
15
,
010132
(
2019
).
8.
Kurtz K.
Miller
, “
Hollywood movie physics to personalize assessments
,”
Phys. Teach.
59
,
325
327
(
2021
).
9.
Richard
Barwell
, “
Working on word problems
,”
Math. Teach.
185
,
6
8
(
2003
).
10.
James H.
Smith
and
Alfred G.
Costantine
, “
Writing better physics exams
,”
Phys. Teach.
26
,
138
144
(
1988
).
11.
Patricia
Heller
,
Ronald
Keith
, and
Scott
Anderson
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving
,”
Am. J. Phys. 60
,
627
636
(
1992
).
12.
Patricia
Heller
and
Mark
Hollabaugh
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
637
644
(
1992
).
13.
Alan
Van Heuvelen
, “
Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
891
897
(
1991
).
14.
Jill
Larkin
et al, “
Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,”
Science
208
,
1335
1342
(
1980
).
15.
Michelene T. H.
Chi
,
Paul J.
Feltovich
, and
Robert
Glaser
, “
Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices
,”
Cognit. Sci.
5
,
121
152
(
1981
).
16.
Andrew
Mason
and
Chandralekha
Singh
, “
Using categorization of problems as an instructional tool to help introductory students learn physics
,”
Phys. Educ.
51
,
025009
(
2016
).
17.
Underrepresented groups include students who self-identify as African American/Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and/or Hispanic/Latino.
18.
The Educational Opportunity Program provides mentorship and a variety of programs and support services to those who are first-generation college students and/or from low-income and educationally disadvantaged backgrounds.
19.
A student is considered first-generation if neither parent (or the single parent in the case of single-parent households) earned a four-year college degree.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.