It has long been suspected by general relativists that physicists who do not specialize in general relativity (GR) believe that special relativity (SR) is incapable of modeling dynamics within accelerated reference frames. Consequently, many physicists may conclude that certain phenomena, such as time dilation due to acceleration, can only be described with GR. The fact of the matter is, as long as spacetime is flat, SR is fully capable of describing the dynamics of accelerated reference frames. In the classic textbook Gravitation, the authors state that “special relativity was developed precisely to predict the physics of accelerated objects.” To quote Sean Carroll in his textbook Spacetime and Geometry, “The notion of acceleration in special relativity has a bad reputation, for no good reason.” Finally, in a quote that drives the main point of this article home, the late general relativist Alfred Schild once said, “A good many believe that [the twin] paradox can only be resolved by the general theory of relativity. They find great comfort in this because they don’t know any general relativity.”

1.
S. M.
Carroll
,
Spacetime and Geometry. An Introduction to General Relativity
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Boston
,
2004
).
2.
Claude
Semay
, “
Observer with a constant proper acceleration
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
27
,
1157
(
2006
).
3.
C. W.
Misner
,
K. S.
Thorne
, and
J. A.
Wheeler
,
Gravitation
(
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
,
2017
).
4.
Edward A.
Desloge
and
R. J.
Philpott
, “
Uniformly accelerated reference frames in special relativity
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
252
261
(
1987
).
5.
F. W.
Sears
and
R. W.
Brehme
,
Introduction to the Theory of Relativity
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Boston
,
1968
).
6.
J.
Gamboa
,
F.
Mendez
,
M. B.
Paranjape
, and
Benoit
Sirois
, “
The ‘twin paradox’: the role of acceleration
,”
Can. J. Phys.
97
,
1049
1063
(
2019
).
7.
Donald
Hall
, “
Intuition, time dilation, and the twin paradox
,”
Phys. Teach.
16
,
209
215
(
1978
).
8.
K. S.
Krane
,
Modern Physics
, 3rd ed. (
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2012
).
9.
J.
Bernstein
,
P. M.
Fishbane
, and
S.
Gasiorowicz
,
Modern Physics
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2000
).
10.
A.
Beiser
,
Concepts of Modern Physics
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
2003
).
11.
J. R.
Taylor
,
M. A.
Dubson
, and
C. D.
Zafiratos
,
Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2004
).
12.
R.
Harris
,
Modern Physics
(
Pearson/Addison Wesley
,
Boston
,
2008
).
13.
S. T.
Thornton
and
A.
Rex
,
Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers
(
Cengage Learning
,
Boston
,
2012
).
14.
Barry Leonard
Werner
, “
The twin paradox revisited
,”
Phys. Teach.
13
,
422
(
1975
).
15.
Sébastien
Cormier
and
Richard
Steinberg
, “
The twin paradox: Exploring student approaches to understanding relativistic concepts
,”
Phys. Teach.
48
,
598
601
(
2010
).
16.
E. F.
Taylor
and
J. A.
Wheeler
,
Spacetime Physics
(
Freeman and Co
.,
New York
,
1992
).
17.
D.
Koks
,
Explorations in Mathematical Physics: The Concepts Behind an Elegant Language
(
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Berlin
,
2006
).
18.
W.
Rindler
,
Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological
(
Osford University Press
,
Oxford
,
2006
).
19.
H. C.
Ohanian
and
R.
Ruffini
,
Gravitation and Spacetime
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
,
2013
).
20.
Øyvind
Grøn
, “
The twin paradox and the principle of relativity
,”
Phys. Scr.
87
,
035004
(
2013
).
21.
E.
Minguzzi
, “
Differential aging from acceleration: An explicit formula
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
876
880
(
2005
).
22.
Gerardo
Muñoz
and
Preston
Jones
, “
The equivalence principle, uniformly accelerated reference frames, and the uniform gravitational field
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
377
383
(
2010
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.