The study of the motion of a projectile, thrown at an angle to the horizon, is a wonderful classical problem. This issue has been the subject of great interest to investigators for centuries. Currently, the study of parabolic motion, in the absence of any drag force, is a common example in introductory physics courses. The theory of parabolic motion allows you to analytically determine the trajectory and all important characteristics of the movement of the projectile. Introduction of air resistance forces into the study of the motion, however, complicates the problem and makes it difficult to obtain analytical solutions. This especially applies to the movement of the projectile, subjected to quadratic air drag force. Numerical studies of projectile motion with quadratic dependence on projectile speed have been performed in many works. From an educational point of view, many students are not confident with numerical methods and gain little insight from using them. So the description of the projectile motion by means of simple approximate analytical formulas under air resistance has great methodological and educational importance. The main goal of this work is to give analytical approximations for the projectile trajectory and movement characteristics as simple as possible from a technical point of view, in order to be grasped even by first-year undergraduates.

1.
G.
Parker
, “
Projectile motion with air resistance quadratic in the speed
,”
Am. J. Phys.
45
,
606
610
(
1977
).
2.
A.
Vial
, “
Horizontal distance travelled by a mobile experiencing a quadratic drag force: normalized distance and parametrization
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
28
,
657
663
(
2007
).
3.
K.
Yabushita
,
M.
Yamashita
, and
K.
Tsuboi
, “
An analytic solution of projectile motion with the quadratic resistance law using the homotopy analysis method
,”
J. Phys. A Math. Theor.
40
,
8403
8416
(
2007
).
4.
M.
Turkyilmazoglu
, “
Highly accurate analytic formulae for projectile motion subjected to quadratic drag
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
37
,
035001
(
2016
).
5.
P.
Chudinov
, “
Analytical investigation of point mass motion in midair
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
25
,
73
79
(
2004
).
6.
P.
Chudinov
,
V.
Eltyshev
, and
Y.
Barykin
, “
Analytical construction of the projectile motion trajectory in midair
,”
MOMENTO Rev. Fis.
62
,
79
96
(
2021
).
7.
C.
Cohen
et al., “
The aerodynamic wall
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
470
,
20130497
(
2014
).
8.
P.
Timmerman
and
J.
van der Weele
, “
On the rise and fall of a ball with linear or quadratic drag
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
538
546
(
1999
).
9.
B.
Okunev
,
Ballistics
, Vol.
2
(
Voyenizdat
,
Moscow
,
1943
), p.
14
.
10.
S.
Timoshenko
and
D.
Young
,
Advanced Dynamics
(
McGraw-Hill Book Co
.,
New York
,
1948
), p.
112
.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.