Quantum physics is the basis for many technologies that are a fundamental part of our daily lives (e.g., lasers) or that may become so in the future (e.g., quantum cryptography and quantum computing). Because of this, quantum physics is now a central aspect of many countries’ secondary school curricula. In this article, we present the design and structure of an online secondary school course for synchronous learning on the historical development of quantum physics and its modern applications. With this online course entitled “Reading Club Quantum Physics: From the Beginnings to Modern Quantum Technologies,” we want to provide teachers with an individually usable resource for reading parts of quantum physics pioneers’ original publications together with their students. For this purpose, we have didactically prepared selected articles with publication dates from 1901 to 2019 and enriched them in this course (consisting of a total of seven chapters) with various work materials. Interested teachers can access our course, without charge, for their own and their students’ use by sending an email to the corresponding author.
References
1.
H. K. E.
Stadermann
, E.
van den Berg
, and M. J.
Goedhart
, “Analysis of secondary school quantum physics curricula of 15 different countries: Different perspectives on a challenging topic
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
15
, 010130
(2019
).2.
C. L.
Chang
and M.
Fang
, “E-learning and online instructions of higher education during the 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) epidemic
,” J. Phys. Conf.
1574
, 012166
(2020
).3.
Wisanti,
R.
Ambawati
, E.
Putri
, D.
Rahayu
, and F.
Khaleyla
, “Science online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: difficulties and challenges
,” J. Phys. Conf.
1747
, 012007
(2021
).4.
C.
Ebner
and A.
Gegenfurtner
, “Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: A meta-analysis
,” Front. Educ.
4
, 1
–11
(2019
).5.
V.
Margoniner
, “Learning gains in introductory astronomy: online can be as good as face-to-face
,” Phys. Teach.
52
, 298
–301
(2014
).6.
S.
Bali
and M. C.
Liu
, “Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses
,” J. Phys. Conf.
1108
, 012094
(2018
).7.
A.
Gegenfurtner
and C.
Ebner
, “Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
,” Educ. Res. Rev.
28
, 100293
(2019
).8.
E. H.
Jones
, Exploring Common Characteristics Among Community College Students: Comparing Online and Traditional Student Success
(Appalachian State University
, Boone, NC
, 2010
).9.
N.
Bosch
et al, “Modeling key differences in underrepresented students’ interactions with an online STEM course
,” TechMindSociety ’18: Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society,
1
–6
(2018
).10.
Scott
Aaronson
et al, “Key concepts for future QIS learners
,” https://files.webservices.illinois.edu/9156/keyconceptsforfutureqislearners5-20.pdf.11.
National Q-12 Education Partnership, https://q12education.org/about.
12.
M.
Debattista
, “A comprehensive rubric for instructional design in e-learning
,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Techn.
35
, 93
–104
(2018
).13.
J. K.
Freericks
, D.
Cutler
, A.
Kruse
, and L. B.
Vieira
, “Teaching quantum mechanics to over 28,000 nonscientists
,” Phys. Teach.
57
, 326
–329
(2019
).14.
M. M.
Daniels
, E.
Sarte
, and J. Dela
Cruz
, “Students’ perception on e-learning: A basis for the development of e-learning framework in higher education institutions
,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.
482
, 012008
(2019
).15.
A.
Gegenfurtner
, A.
Zitt
, and C.
Ebner
, “Evaluating webinar-based training: a mixed methods study of trainee reactions toward digital web conferencing
,” Int. J. Train. Develop.
24
, 5
–21
(2020
).16.
G.
Shi
, “Research on the influence of online learning on students’ desire to learn
,” J. Phys. Conf.
1693
, 012055
(2020
).17.
K.
Mukhtar
, K.
Javed
, M.
Arooj
, and A.
Sethi
, “Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era
,” Pak. J. Med. Sci.
36
, 27
–31
(2020
).18.
M.
Leone
and M.
Rinaudo
, “Should the history of physics be rated X? A survey of physics teachers’ expectations
,” Phys. Educ.
55
, 035013
(2020
).19.
S.
Kapon
, “Constructing conceptual meaning from a popular scientific paper—the case of E=mc²
,” Phys. Educ.
48
, 90
–95
(2013
).20.
M. Barth
Tu
, “Electromagnetic induction rediscovered using original texts
,” Sci. Educ.
9
, 375
–387
(2000
).21.
C. R.
Pagliarini
and M. J. P. M.
de Almeida
, “Reading scientists in the high school classroom: peer and teacher mediation
,” Phys. Educ.
56
, 035008
(2021
).22.
Y. J.
Dori
, “From nationwide standardized testing to school-based alternative embedded assessment in Israel: Students’ performance in the matriculation 2000 project
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
40
, 34
–52
(2002
).23.
H.
Falk
, G.
Brill
, and A.
Yarden
, “Teaching a biotechnology curriculum based on adapted primary literature
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
30
, 1841
–1866
(2008
).24.
We justify this goal with the fact that the development of quantum physics is considered exemplary for an extraordinary theory change in physics.
25.
ILIAS, https://www.ilias.de/en/.
26.
M.
Planck
, “Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum
,” Ann. Phys.
309
, 553
–563
(1901
).27.
A.
Einstein
, “Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt
,” Ann. Phys.
322
, 132
–148
(1905
).28.
F.
Arute
et al, “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
,” Nature
574
, 505
–510
(2019
).29.
C. H.
Bennett
and G.
Brassard
, “Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing
,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing
, 175
–179
(1984
).30.
M.
Born
, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge
,” Z. f. Phys.
37
, 863
–867
(1926
).31.
M.
Born
, Physik im Wandel meiner Zeit
(Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
, Wiesbaden
), 173
–184
(1983
).32.
T.
Anderson
and J.
Shattuck
, “Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?
” Educ. Res.
41
, 16
–25
(2012
).33.
We provide material for such input phases so that teachers may provide their students with all relevant information or may introduce physical concepts (e.g., wave functions) that are required to read the articles.
34.
A.
Einstein
, B.
Podolsky
, and N.
Rosen
, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?
” Phys. Rev.
47
, 777
–780
(1935
).35.
E.
Schrödinger
, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems
,” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
31
, 555
–563
(1935
).36.
P.
Bronner
, A.
Strunz
, C.
Silberhorn
, and J.-P.
Meyn
, “Interactive screen experiments with single photons
,” Eur. J. Phys.
30
, 345
–353
(2009
).37.
M. A.
Rowe
et al, “Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection
,” Nature
409
, 791
–794
(2001
).38.
Yin
et al, “Lower bound on the speed of nonlocal correlations without locality and measurement choice loopholes
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
, 260407
(2013
).39.
T. H.
Maiman
, “Stimulated optical radiation in ruby
,” Nature
187
, 493
–494
(1960
).40.
H5P, https://h5p.org/.
41.
E.
Pednault
, J. A.
Gunnels
, G.
Nannicini
, L.
Horesh
, and R.
Wisnieff
, “Leveraging secondary storage to simulate deep 54-qubit Sycamore circuits
,” arXiv: 1910.09534 (preprint, 2019
).42.
A.
Acín
et al, “The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community view
,” New J. Phys.
20
, 080201
(2018
).43.
P. W.
Shor
, “Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring,” in
Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,
124
–134
(1994
).44.
W. K.
Wootters
and W. H.
Zurek
, “A single quantum cannot be cloned
,” Nature
299
, 802
–803
(1982
).© 2022 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2022
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
