This paper outlines the feasibility of replacing a midterm assessment with a student-created digital media project. We examine the benefits of a peer review process for student-created pedagogy, the effectiveness of the student-generated digital media, and self-evaluations as a replacement for traditional forms of assessment. We conclude that this innovative teaching and assessment model is both effective and timely as more college courses are being taught digitally and/or asynchronously.

1.
R. T.
Sivarajah
 et al,
“A review of innovative teaching methods
,”
Acad. Radiol.
26
,
101
113
(
2019
).
2.
M.
Kearney
,
“A learning design for student-generated digital storytelling
,”
Learn. Media Technol.
36
,
169
188
(
2011
).
3.
I.
Kosterelioglu
,
“Student views on learning environments enriched by video clips
,”
Univers. J. Educ. Res.
4
,
359
369
(
2016
).
4.
T. L.
Larkin
,
“The student conference: A model of authentic assessment
,”
Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.
4
,
36
(
2014
).
5.
M. R.
Laugerman
and
K. P.
Saunders
,
“Supporting student learning through instructional videos in business statistics
,”
Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ.
17
,
387
404
(
2019
).
6.
C. J.
Luxford
and
S. L.
Bretz
,
“Moving beyond definitions: What student-generated models reveal about their understanding of covalent bonding and ionic bonding
,”
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
14
,
214
222
(
2013
).
7.
N.
Mirriahi
,
D.
Liaqat
,
S.
Dawson
, and
D.
Gaševic
,
“Uncovering student learning profiles with a video annotation tool: Reflective learning with and without instructional norms
,”
Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.
64
,
1083
1106
(
2016
).
8.
B.
Tucker
,
“The flipped classroom
,”
Educ. Next
12
,
82
83
(
2012
).
9.
M.
Simonson
,
S. M.
Zvacek
, and
S.
Smaldino
,
Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education,
7th ed. (
2019
).
10.
D.
Johnson
,
R.
Johnson
, and
K.
Smith
, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom (
Interaction Book Company
,
1998
).
11.
R.
Hawley
and
C.
Allen
,
“Student-generated video creation for assessment: Can it transform assessment within higher education?
Int. J. Transform. Res.
5
,
1
11
(
2018
).
12.
A.
Rundquist
,
presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings
,
2012
(unpublished).
13.
J.
Reyna
,
J.
Hanham
, and
P.
Meier
,
“A taxonomy of digital media types for Learner-Generated Digital Media assignments
,”
E-Learn. Digital Media
14
,
309
322
(
2017
).
14.
J.
Reyna
,
J.
Hanham
,
P.
Vlachopoulos
, and
P.
Meier
,
“A systematic approach to designing, implementing, and evaluating Learner-Generated Digital Media (LGDM) assignments and its effect on self-regulation in tertiary science education
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
51
,
1501
1527
(
2019
).
15.
R. C.
Choe
 et al,
“Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos
,”
CBE Life Sci. Educ.
18
,
ar55
(
2019
).
16.
W.
Nielsen
,
H.
Georgiou
,
P.
Jones
, and
A.
Turney
,
“Digital explanation as assessment in university science
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
50
,
2391
2418
(
2018
).
17.
C.
Snelson
,
“Video production in content-area pedagogy: A scoping study of the research literature
,”
Learn. Media Technol.
43
,
294
306
(
2018
).
18.
A. S.
Halim
,
S. A.
Finkenstaedt-Quinn
,
L. J.
Olsen
,
A. R.
Gere
, and
G. V.
Shultz
,
“Identifying and remediating student misconceptions in introductory biology via writing-to-learn assignments and peer review
,”
CBE Life Sci. Educ.
17
,
ar28
(
2018
).
19.
E.
Price
,
F.
Goldberg
,
S.
Robinson
, and
M.
McKean
,
“Validity of peer grading using Calibrated Peer Review in a guided-inquiry, conceptual physics course
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
,
020145
(
2016
).
20.
K. J.
Topping
,
“Peer assessment
,”
Theory Pract.
48
,
20
27
(
2009
).
21.
S.-Y.
Lin
 et al,
“Peer evaluation of video lab reports in an introductory physics MOOC
,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1407.4714 (
2014
).
22.
L.
Rubin
and
C.
Hebert
,
“Model for active learning: Collaborative peer teaching
,”
Coll. Teach.
46
,
26
30
(
2010
).
23.
J.
Pirhonen
and
P.
Rasi
,
“Student-generated instructional videos facilitate learning through positive emotions
,”
J. Biol. Educ.
51
,
215
227
(
2017
).
24.
P. P.
Urone
and
R.
Hinrichs
, College Physics (
OpenStax
,
2018
).
25.
J. P.
Abulencia
,
D. L.
Silverstein
, and
M. A.
Vigeant
,
“Building a student-generated instructional video library for thermodynamics
,”
Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
,
Indianapolis, IN
, .
26.
P. J.
Stephens
,
“Narrated video clips improve student learning
,”
World J. Educ.
7
,
14
20
(
2017
).
27.
A.
Weinberg
and
M.
Thomas
,
“Student learning and sense-making from video lectures
,”
Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol.
49
,
922
943
(
2018
).
28.
M. J.
Serra
and
K. G.
DeMarree
,
“Unskilled and unaware in the classroom: College students’ desired grades predict their biased grade predictions
,”
Mem. Cognit.
44
,
1127
1137
(
2016
).
29.
M.
Gallardo-Williams
,
L. A.
Morsch
,
C.
Paye
, and
M. K.
Seery
,
“Student-generated video in chemistry education
,”
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
21
(
2
),
488
495
(
2020
).
30.
G.
Hoban
,
W.
Nielsen
, and
A.
Shepherd
,
Student-Generated Digital Media in Science Education: Learning, Explaining and Communicating Content
(
2015
).
31.
J.
Wiggen
and
D.
McDonnell
,
“Geoscience videos and their role in supporting student learning
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
46
,
44
49
(
2017
).
32.
M. E.
Walvoord
,
M. H.
Hoefnagels
,
D. D.
Gaffin
,
M. M.
Chumchal
, and
D. A.
Long
,
“An analysis of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) in a science lecture classroom
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
37
,
66
73
(
2008
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.