Teaching special relativity to lower-division students is challenging because results such as time dilation, length contraction, and frame dependence of simultaneity are counterintuitive. The literature is extensive, so only a brief list is given here, with articles divided roughly between discussions of general principles and calculations applied to selected physical systems.
REFERENCES
1.
R.
Scherr
, P.
Schaffer
, and S.
Vokos
, “Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and reference frames
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
, S24
–S35
(July 2001
).2.
D.
Miller
, “A constructive approach to the special theory of relativity
,” Am. J. Phys.
78
, 633
–638
(June 2010
).3.
E.
Huggins
, “Special relativity in week one: 1) The principle of relativity
,” Phys. Teach.
49
, 148
–151
(March 2011
);E.
Huggins
, “Special relativity in week one: 2) All clocks run slow
,” Phys. Teach.
49
, 220
–221
(April 2011
);E.
Huggins
, “Special relativity in week one: 3) Introducing the Lorentz contraction
,” Phys. Teach. 49
, 302
–303
(May 2011
);E.
Huggins
, “Special relativity in week one: 4) Lack of simultaneity
,” Phys. Teach.
49
, 340
–342
(Sept. 2011
).4.
M.
Egdall
, “Teaching special relativity to lay students
,” Phys. Teach.
52
, 406
–409
(Oct. 2014
).5.
W.
Nelson
, “Special relativity from the dynamical viewpoint
,” Am. J. Phys.
83
, 600
–607
(July 2015
).6.
C.
Naddy
, S.
Dudley
, and R.
Haaland
, “Projectile motion in special relativity
,” Phys. Teach.
38
, 27
–29
(Jan. 2000
).7.
R.
Piccioni
, “Special relativity and magnetism in an introductory physics course
,” Phys. Teach.
45
, 152
–155
(March 2007
).8.
B.
Tefft
and A.
Tefft
, “Galilean relativity and work-kinetic energy theorem
,” Phys. Teach.
45
, 218
–220
(April 2007
).9.
C.
Dib
, “Mass as a form of energy in a simple example
,” Phys. Teach.
51
, 546
–548
(Dec. 2013
).10.
P.
Riggs
, “A comparison of kinetic energy and momentum in special relativity and classical mechanics
,” Phys. Teach.
54
, 80
–82
(Feb. 2016
).11.
B.
Ackerson
, “Special relativity at low relative velocities
,” Phys. Teach.
57
, 323
–325
(May 2019
).12.
M.
Frodyma
, “Relativistic and Newtonian motion under a constant force using dimensional analysis and calculus
,” Phys. Teach.
58
, 119
–122
(Feb. 2020
).13.
P.
Blanco
, “Maximum momentum and kinetic energy of a rocket
,” Phys. Teach.
58
, 534
–535
(Nov. 2020
).14.
E.
Hecht
, “Einstein never approved of relativistic mass
,” Phys. Teach.
47
, 336
–341
(Sept. 2009
).15.
L.
Okun
, “The concept of mass
,” Phys. Today
42
, 31
–36
(June 1989
).16.
17.
W.
Bade
, “Relativistic rocket theory
,” Am. J. Phys.
21
, 310
–312
(April 1953
).18.
J.
Rhee
, “Relativistic rocket motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
33
, 587
(July 1965
).19.
K.
Pomeranz
, “The relativistic rocket
,” Am. J. Phys.
34
, 565
–566
(July 1966
).20.
A.
Antippa
, “The relativistic rocket
,” Eur. J. Phys.
30
, 605
(April 2009
).21.
N.
Bokor
, “The relativistic rocket on an energy-momentum diagram
,” Eur. J. Phys.
40
, 1
–11
(Jan. 2019
).22.
H.
Young
and R.
Freedman
, University Physics
, 14th ed. (Pearson, Boston
, 2016
), pp. 258
–260
.23.
J.
Stewart
, Calculus, Early Transcendentals
, 7th ed. (Brooks/Cole
, Belmont, CA
, 2012
), p. 291
.© 2022 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2022
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
