During the course of international curriculum reform, decision making about socioscientific issues (SSI)—open-ended controversial issues with connections to science, technology, and society—has been labeled a critical tool for achieving scientific literacy. Therefore, enhancing students’ socioscientific decision making as part of science education has become a pressing issue; global SSI affect people every day. This leads people worldwide to collaboratively involve in decision-making processes to solve these ill-structured problems for the sake and safety of humanity. Values are core principles and guidelines that support socioscientific decision making. Therefore, recent conceptualizations of scientific literacy also consider values a core component of this vision of science education. However, few instructional strategies have been provided to support students’ enactment of character and values. Role play has proven to be an effective way of socioscientific decision making because it can empower students’ emotive, intuitive, and ethical reasoning, through which students can enact and develop values regarding SSI. In this paper, we provide an example lesson plan for fostering high school students’ values and decision making about the issue of nuclear energy through role play.

1.
Ministry of National Education
,
Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [Science Course Instruction Program (Elementary and Middle School, 3,4,5,6,7,8 Grades]
(
Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı
,
Ankara, Turkey
,
2018
).
2.
H.
Lee
,
H.
Chang
,
K.
Choi
,
S-W.
Kim
, and
D. L.
Zeidler
, “
Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
34
(
6
),
925
–
953
(
2012
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
K.
Choi
,
H.
Lee
,
N.
Shin
,
S-W.
Kim
, and
J.
Krajcik
, “
Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
48
(
6
),
670
–
679
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
L.
Agell
,
V.
Soria
, and
M.
Carrió
, “
Using role play to debate animal testing
,”
J. Biol. Educ.
49
(
3
),
309
–
321
(
2015
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.943788
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
P.
Archila
, “
Using drama to promote argumentation in science education. The case of ‘should’ve,’
”
Sci. Educ.
26
(
3-4
),
345
–
375
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9901-7
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
M.
Chowdhury
, “
Emphasizing morals, values, ethics, and character education in science education and science teaching
,”
Malaysian Online J. Educ. Sci.
4
(
2
),
1
–
16
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol4no2.1
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
V.
Albe
, “
When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
38
(
1
),
67
–
90
(
2008
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
A.
Bulte
,
H.
Westbroek
,
O.
de Jong
, and
A.
Pilot
, “
A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
28
(
9
),
1063
–
1086
(
2006
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702520
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
J. L.
Eastwood
,
T. D.
Sadler
,
D. L.
Zeidler
,
A.
Lewis
,
L.
Amiri
, and
S.
Applebaum
, “
Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
34
(
15
),
2289
–
2315
(
2012
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
R. T.
Tal
 and
N.
Hochberg
, “
Reasoning, problem-solving and reflections: Participating in WISE project in Israel
,”
Sci. Educ. Int.
14
,
3
–
19
(
2003
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
T. D.
Sadler
,
W. L.
Romine
, and
M. S.
Topçu
, “
Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
38
(
10
),
1622
–
1635
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
A.
Zohar
 and
F.
Nemet
, “
Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
39
(
1
),
35
–
62
(
2002
).
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
T. D.
Sadler
,
M. L.
Klosterman
, and
M. S.
Topcu
, “Learning Science Content and Socio-Scientific Reasoning Through Classroom Explorations of Global Climate Change,” in
T.
Sadler
 (Ed.),
Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research
(
Springer
,
Dordrecht
,
2011
), pp.
45
–
77
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
V.
Dawson
 and
K.
Carson
, “
Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
50
(
3
),
863
–
883
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
F. Y.
Yang
 and
O. R.
Anderson
, “
Senior high school students’ preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
25
(
2
),
221
–
244
(
2003
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126739
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
Y-T.
Wu
 and
C-C.
Tsai
, “
High school students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
29
(
9
),
1163
–
1187
(
2007
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
Y-T.
Wu
 and
C-C.
Tsai
, “
The effects of different online searching activities on high school students’ cognitive structures and informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
41
(
5
),
771
–
785
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9189-y
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
S. R.
Fowler
,
D. L.
Zeidler
, and
T. D.
Sadler
, “
Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
31
(
2
),
279
–
296
(
2009
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
19.
G. A.
Smith
 and
D. R.
Williams
,
Ecological Education in Action: On Weaving Education, Culture, and the Environment
(
State University of New York Press
,
Albany, NY
,
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
20.
D.
Hodson
, “
Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action
,”
Sci Educ.
83
(
6
),
775
–
796
(
1999
).
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
21.
T. D.
Sadler
,
J. A.
Foulk
, and
P. J.
Friedrichsen
, “
Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning
,”
Int. J. Educ. Math Sci. Technol.
5
(
2
),
75
–
87
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
22.
M.
Kim
,
R.
Anthony
, and
D.
Blades
, “
Decision making through dialogue: A case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
44
(
6
),
903
–
926
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
© 2021 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2021
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.