A common procedure when conducting physics experiments is to repeat a measurement several times to calculate the mean and standard deviation. That might be the only instruction we give to students as a means to minimize random errors. However, that technique does not guarantee that the answer will be correct. It might give the same wrong answer every time. How then can we teach students to avoid systematic errors? We don’t focus on that problem enough when teaching physics. Part of the problem is that we and the students usually know the correct answers in advance, since student experiments have usually been repeated thousands of times by others.
References
1.
L.
Holman
, M.
Head
, R.
Lanfear
, and M.
Jennions
, “Evidence of experimental bias in the life sciences: Why we need blind data recording
,” PLOS Biol.
13
(7
), e1002190
(July
2015
).2.
M.
Jeng
, “A selected history of expectation bias in physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
74
, 578
–583
(July 2006
).3.
A.
Franklin
, “Forging, cooking, trimming, and riding on the bandwagon
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 786
–793
(Sept.
1984
).4.
R.
Cross
, “Launch of a vehicle from a ramp
,” Phys. Teach.
49
, 410
–411
(Oct.
2011
).5.
6.
R.
Cross
, “The Chappaquiddick incident
,” Phys. Teach.
54
, 520
–522
(Dec.
2016
).7.
R.
Cross
, “Basic physics of vehicle acceleration
,” Phys. Teach.
56
, 358
–360
(Sept.
2018
).© 2021 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2021
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
