The ground-breaking image of a black hole’s event horizon, which captured the public’s attention and imagination in April 2019, was captured using the power of interferometry: many separate telescopes working together to observe the cosmos in incredible detail. Many recent astrophysical discoveries that have revolutionized the scientific community’s understanding of the cosmos were made by interferometers such as LIGO, ALMA, and the Event Horizon Telescope. Astro 101 instructors who want their students to learn the science behind these discoveries must teach about interferometry. Decades of research show that using active learning strategies can significantly increase students’ learning and reduce achievement gaps between different demographic groups over what is achieved from traditional lecture-based instruction. As part of an effort to create active learning materials on interferometry, we developed and tested a new Lecture-Tutorial to help Astro 101 students learn about key properties of astronomical interferometers. This paper describes this new Lecture-Tutorial and presents evidence for its effectiveness from a study conducted with 266 Astro 101 students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

1.
S.
Freeman
,
S. L.
Eddy
,
M.
McDonough
,
M. K.
Smith
,
N.
Okoroafor
, and
M. P.
Wenderoth
, “
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
,”
PNAS
111
,
8410
(
2014
);
[PubMed]
P.
Black
and
D.
William
, “
Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment
,”
Phi Del. Kap.
86
,
139
(
1998
);
S. L.
Eddy
and
K. A.
Hogan
, “
Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work?
CBE Life Sci. Educ.
13
,
453
(
2014
);
[PubMed]
M.
Lorenzo
,
C. H.
Crouch
, and
E.
Mazur
, “
Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
118
(
Feb.
2006
);
A. L.
Rudolph
,
E. E.
Prather
,
G.
Brissenden
,
D.
Consiglio
, and
V.
Gonzaga
, “
A national study assessing the teaching and learning of introductory astronomy. Part II. The connection between student demographics and learning
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
9
,
010107
(
2010
).
2.
J. W.
Eckenrode
,
E. E.
Prather
, and
C. S.
Wallace
, “
Correlations between students’ written responses to Lecture-Tutorial questions and their understandings of key astrophysics concepts
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
45
,
65
(
2016
).
3.
E. E.
Prather
,
T. F.
Slater
,
J. P.
Adams
,
J. M.
Bailey
,
L. V.
Jones
, and
J. A.
Dostal
, “
Research on a Lecture-Tutorial approach to teaching introductory astronomy for non–science majors
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
3
,
122
(
2004
);
E. E.
Prather
and
G.
Brissenden
, “
Clickers as data gathering tools and students’ attitudes, motivations, and beliefs on their use in this application
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
8
,
010103
(
2009
);
C. S.
Wallace
,
E. E.
Prather
, and
D. K.
Duncan
, “
A study of general education astronomy students’ understandings of cosmology. Part V. The effects of a new suite of cosmology Lecture-Tutorials on students’ conceptual knowledge
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
34
,
1297
(
2012
);
M. C.
LoPresto
, and
S. R.
Murrell
, “
Using the Star Properties Concept Inventory to compare instruction with Lecture Tutorials to traditional lectures
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
8
,
010105
(
2009
);
C. S.
Wallace
,
E. E.
Prather
,
S. D.
Hornstein
,
J. O.
Burns
,
W. M.
Schlingman
, and
T. G.
Chambers
, “
A new Lecture-Tutorial for teaching about molecular excitations and synchrotron radiation
,”
Phys. Teach.
54
,
40
(
Jan.
2016
).
4.
A.
Quirrenbach
, “
The development of astronomical interferometry
,”
Exp. Astron.
26
,
49
(
2009
).
5.
C.
Haniff
, “
An introduction to the theory of interferometry
,”
New Astron. Rev.
51
,
565
(
2007
).
6.
Readers can view the materials at TPT Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/10.0006124, under the Supplemental tab.
7.
E. M.
Bardar
,
E. E.
Prather
,
K.
Brecher
, and
T. F.
Slater
, “
Development and validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
5
,
103
(
2007
).
8.
L. J.
Cronbach
, “
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
,”
Psychometrika
16
,
3
(
1951
).
9.
D.
George
and
P.
Mallery
,
SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference
, 4th ed. (
Allyn & Bacon
,
Boston, MA
,
2003
).
10.
N.
Schmitt
, “
Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha
,”
Psychol. Assess.
8
,
4
(
1996
).
11.
R. R.
Hake
, “
Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
(
Jan.
1998
);
J. D.
Marx
and
K.
Cummings
, “
Normalized change
,”
Am. J. Phys.
75
,
87
(
Jan.
2007
).
12.
J.
Cohen
,
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
,
Hillsdale, NJ
,
1988
).

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.