Physics courses that focus on developing and assessing student competency through the use of standards have successfully been implemented in the past. It appears to be the case that not enough practical information is available to instructors planning to engage on this modality.

1.
B. A.
Green
 Jr.
, “
Physics teaching by the Keller plan at MIT
,”
Am. J. Phys.
39
,
764
775
(
July
1971
).
2.
G.
Markle
and
W.
Capie
, “
A competency-based physics program for elementary teachers
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
4
,
254
256
(
1975
).
3.
I. D.
Beatty
, “
Standards-based grading in introductory university physics
,”
J. Scholar. Teach. Learn.
13
,
1
22
(
2013
).
4.
T.
Zimmerman
, “
Grading for understanding - Standards-based grading
,”
Phys. Teach.
55
,
47
50
(
Jan.
2017
).
5.
A.
Rajapaksha
and
A. S.
Hirsch
, “
Competency based teaching of college physics: The philosophy and the practice
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
13
,
020130
(
2017
).
6.
Matt
Townsley
, “
What is the difference between standards-based grading (or reporting) and competency-based education?
https://www.competencyworks.org/analysis/what-is-the-difference-between-standards-based-grading/.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.