Scientific laboratories are among the most challenging course components to integrate into online instruction. Available technology restricts the design and nature of experiments, and it can be hard to replicate the collaborative lab environment where frequent and immediate instructor feedback is the norm. Here we report on technological and pedagogical aspects of newly developed labs for online courses using the Interactive Online Lab (iOLab) device. We argue that this technology, coupled with an online course design emphasizing teamwork, targeted feedbacks, and self-regulation skills, provides a robust framework for students to do reliable, engaging, inquiry-based and hands-on labs outside the classroom. After describing the implementation and technology, we explain our lab objectives and how the labs were integrated into two introductory physics courses. We conclude with an example lab on kinematics.

1.
Joseph
Kozminski
et al, “
AAPT Recommendations for the Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Curriculum
” (
AAPT, College Park
)
2014
.
2.
E.
Etkina
and
A.
Van Heuvelen
, “
Investigative Science Learning Environment—A science process approach to learning physics
,” in
Research-Based Reform of University Physics
, Vol.
1
(
2007
), pp.
1
48
.
3.
N. G.
Holmes
,
C. E.
Wieman
, and
D. A.
Bonn
, “
Teaching critical thinking
,”
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
112
(
36
),
11199
11204
(
2015
).
4.
E. K.
Faulconer
and
A. B.
Gruss
, “
A review to weigh the pros and cons of online, remote, and distance science laboratory experiences
,”
Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn.
19
(
2
) (
2018
).
5.
H.
Keller
and
E.
Keller
, “
Making real virtual labs
,”
Sci. Educ. Rev.
4
(
1
),
2
11
(
2005
).
6.
J. R.
Brinson
, “
Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research
,”
Comp. Educ.
87
,
218
237
(
2015
).
7.
K.
Pyatt
and
R.
Sims
, “
Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: Attitudes, performance and access
,”
J. Sci. Educ. Technol.
21
(
1
),
133
147
(
2012
).
8.
R.
Reis
, “
Science Online-Bringing the Laboratory Home
,” https://tomprof.stanford.edu/posting/1576.
9.
R.
Reuter
, “
Online versus in the classroom: Student success in ahands-on lab class
,”
Am. J. Distance Educ.
23
(
3
),
151
162
(
2009
).
10.
M. M.
Waldrop
, “
Education online: The virtual lab
,”
Nature
499
(
7458
),
268
(
2013
).
11.
E.
Bodegom
,
E.
Jensen
, and
D.
Sokoloff
, “
Adapting RealTime Physics for distance learning with the iOLab
,”
Phys. Teach.
57
,
382
(
Sept.
2019
).
12.
F.
Moosvi
,
S.
Reinsberg
, and
G.
Rieger
, “
Can a hands-on physics project lab be delivered effectively as adistance lab?
Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn.
20
(
1
) (
2019
).
13.
J.
Lang
, “
Comparative study of hands-on and remote physics labs for first year university level physics students
,”
Transformative Dialogues Teach. Learn. J.
6
,
1
25
(
2012
).
14.
iOLab Wireless Lab System, iOLab, http://www.iolab.science/.
19.
R.
Lock
,
P.
Lock
,
K. Lock
Morgan
,
E.
Lock
, and
D.
Lock
, StatKey, http://www.lock5stat.com/StatKey/.
20.
PhET Interactive Simulations
,” University of Colorado, https://phet.colorado.edu/.
21.
A.
Nair
and
V.
Sawtelle
, “
Real-time visualization of equipotential lines using the IOLab
,”
Phys. Teach.
56
,
512
514
(
Oct.
2018
).
22.
D. R.
Sokoloff
,
R. K.
Thornton
, and
P. W.
Laws
, “
RealTime Physics: Active learning labs transforming the introductory laboratory
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
28
,
83
94
(
2007
).
23.
N. G.
Holmes
and
E. M.
Smith
, “
Operationalizing the AAPT learning goals for the lab
,”
Phys. Teach.
57
,
296
299
(
May
2019
).
24.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force Concept Inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
141
(
March
1992
).
25.
L.
Leblond
, “
IOLab
,” https://sites.psu.edu/lleblond/iolab/.
26.
M. G.
Moore
(Ed.),
Handbook of Distance Education
(
Routledge
,
2013
).
27.
E.
Van Popta
,
M.
Kral
,
G.
Camp
,
R. L.
Martens
, and
P. R.-J.
Simons
, “
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
,”
Educ. Res. Rev.
20
,
24
34
(
2017
).
28.
A.
Furberg
, “
Teacher support in computer-supported lab work: Bridging the gap between lab experiments and students’ conceptual understanding
,”
Int. J. Comp. Supported Collaborative Learn.
11
(
1
),
89
113
(
2016
).
29.
The UIUC PER group is reforming the introductory physics labs at the University of Illinois, taken by over 2500 students per semester, using IOLab and asimilar ISLE-inspired approach.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.