Many high school and first-year university courses include discussion of the magnetic effect of currents. Frequently discussed textbook examples include long, straight wires, circular current loops, and solenoids, partly because these examples are tractable mathematically. The solenoid naturally leads to discussion on magnetic materials since it is readily demonstrated that a paramagnetic core significantly boosts the strength of an electromagnet. However, magnetic effects of solid and even liquid materials are subtle and confusing and the mathematics is not straightforward. This leads to confusion amongst students (and their teachers), which, when taken to more advanced study, leads to significant misconceptions about the nature of magnetic properties and fields. These misconceptions can become problematic when practical (rather than stereotyped) magnetic design and analysis is required such as for transformers, magnetic recording materials, geomagnetic sensors, or biological stimulators to name a few. In this article, I highlight examples of this confusion, in particular the failure in realistic situations of the well-quoted formula for an infinite solenoid with a paramagnetic core, and the physical interpretation of the relative permeability of a material, µr.

1.
D.
Laumann
, “
Even liquids are magnetic: Observation of the Moses effect and the inverse Moses effect
,”
Phys. Teach.
56
,
352
354
(
Sept.
2018
).
2.
W. G.
Hurley
and
W. H.
Wölfle
,
Transformers and Inductors for Power Electronics: Theory, Design and Applications
(
Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
,
West Sussex, UK
,
2013
).
3.
S.
Matsushita
,
Principles of Geomagnetic Phenomena
(
Elsevier Science
,
2016
).
4.
M. T.
Wilson
,
A. D.
Tang
,
K.
Iyer
,
H.
McKee
,
J.
Waas
, and
J.
Rodger
, “
The challenges of producing effective small coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation of mice
,”
Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express
4
,
037002
(
2018
).
5.
J. J.
Roche
, “
B and H, the intensity vectors of magnetism: A new approach to resolving a century-old controversy
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
,
438
(May
2000
).
6.
K. R.
Demarest
,
Engineering Electromagnetics
(
Prentice-Hall Inc.
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
1998
), p.
249
.
7.
Z.
Tanel
and
M.
Erol
, “
Students’ difficulties in understanding the concepts of magnetic field strength, magnetic flux density and magnetization
,”
Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ.
2
(
3
),
184
191
(
2008
).
8.
R. A.
Serway
,
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
, 6th ed., international ed. (
Brooks/Cole
,
Belmont, CA
,
2004
), p.
947
.
9.
J. H.
Cloete
, “Is B or H the fundamental magnetic field?” in
Proceedings of IEEE AFRICON ‘96
,
Stellenbosch, South Africa
(
1996
) pp.
354
361
. DOI: .
10.
S. T.
Thornton
and
A.
Rex
,
Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers
, 3rd ed. (
Brooks/Cole
,
Belmont, CA
,
2006
), p.
358
.
11.
D.
Laumann
, “
Is an apple magnetic: Magnetic response of everyday materials supporting views about the nature of science
,”
Phys. Teach.
55
,
142
145
(March
2017
).
12.
C. A.
Sawicki
, “
Inexpensive demonstration of the magnetic properties of matter
,”
Phys. Teach.
36
,
553
555
(
Dec.
1998
).
13.
A.
Giambattista
,
Physics
, 5th ed. (
McGraw-Hill Education
,
New York
,
2019
), p.
751
.
14.
Q.
Wang
, “
Finite element analysis for the magnetostatic field
,” in
Practical Design of Magnetostatic Structure Using Numerical Simulation
(
2013
).
15.
See comsol.com/acdc-module, accessed Oct. 24, 2019.
16.
P. M.
Pugh
and
P. W.
Pugh
,
Principles of Electricity and Magnetism
, 2nd ed. (
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
,
Reading, MA
,
1970
), p.
302
.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.