In a traditional teaching approach, a physics course begins with mechanics, and generally the braking effect due to magnetic interactions is not mentioned among the various types of friction presented (static, sliding, rolling) because students will discover magnetism only in later chapters. In our didactic experience this traditional choice is only partially effective for two reasons. First of all it does not distinguish between the nature of the interactions involved in friction processes and the way in which their effects appear, allowing students to believe erroneously, for example, that sliding friction (due ultimately to electrical interactions) is intrinsically “more mechanical” than the braking force produced by magnets moving over a metal surface. Secondly, the traditional approach doesn’t consider that Newtonian dynamics is sufficient to get a quantitative albeit empirical description of a magnetic braking force, without any introduction to magnetism, exactly as it is traditionally done, for example, for sliding friction, described as a force without discussing its complex electrical nature.

1.
J. A.
Molina-Bolivar
and
A. J.
Abella-Palacios
, “
A laboratory activity on the eddy current brake
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
33
,
697
707
(
2012
).
2.
Chris
Gaffney
and
Adam
Catching
, “
Magnetic viscous drag for friction lab
,”
Phys. Teach.
54
,
335
337
(
Sept.
2016
).
3.
Fernando G.
Tomasel
and
Mario C.
Marconi
, “
Rolling magnets down a conductive hill: Revisiting a classic demonstration of the effects of eddy currents
,”
Am. J. Phys.
80
,
800
803
(
Sept.
2012
).
4.
G.
Donoso
,
C. L.
Ladera
, and
P.
Marin
, “
Magnet fall inside a conductive pipe: Motion and the role of the pipe wall thickness
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
30
,
855
869
(
2009
).
5.
F.
Behroozi
, “
Weighing a magnet as it falls with terminal velocity through an aluminum pipe
,”
Phys. Teach.56
,
474
477
(Oct.
2018
).
6.
Louis H.
Cadwell
, “
Magnetic damping: Analysis of an eddy current brake using an airtrack
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
917
923
(July
1996
).
7.
Michele
D’Anna
, “Modelling Physical Processes: The Example of a Magnetic Glider,” in
Marisa
Michelini
and
Marina
Cobal
(Eds.),
Selected Contributions of the First International GIREP Seminar – Developing Formal Thinking in Physics
(
Forum
,
Udine, Italy
,
2001
), pp.
191
198
.
8.
We used a PASCO Wireless Smart Cart ME-1240 and the Capstone software. Details can be found at https://www.pasco.com/index.cfm. See also
Asif
Shakur
and
Rainor
Connor
, “
The PASCO Wireless Smart Cart: A game changer in the undergraduate physics laboratory
,”
Phys. Teach.
56
,
152
(
March
2018
).
9.
Yan
Levin
,
Fernando L.
da Silveira
, and
Felipe B.
Rizzato
, “
Electromagnetic braking: A simple quantitative model
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
815
817
(
Sept.
2006
).
10.
David
Acheson
,
From Calculus to Chaos – An Introduction to Dynamics
(
Oxford University Press
,
1997
).
11.
Hans U.
Fuchs
,
Modeling of Uniform Dynamical Systems
(
Orell-Füssli
,
Zürich
,
2002
).
12.
The model is realized with the software STELLA, https://www.iseesystems.com/. Since STELLA is not free, one might consider open source solutions, such as InsightMaker, which allows the students to work both at school and at home. For instance, the model in Fig. 7 can be found at https://insightmaker.com/insight/159667/Cart-on-incline-with-magnetic-friction.
13.
Tommaso Corridoni and Michele D’Anna
, “
Modeling mechanical, magnetic and thermal processes in high school lab activities: An experiment with a rotating disc
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
1076
,
012017
(
2018
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.