For several years, I taught a general education course on the Manhattan Project for students majoring in the arts and humanities who needed a physical science credit as a condition of their graduation requirements. As might be imagined, the challenge in teaching this course was to find a balance between quantitative and qualitative content. A technical point of particular importance was to find a way to describe how fundamental-physics considerations restrict the number of possible candidate “weaponizability” isotopes to just a handful, of which only uranium-235 (U-235) and plutonium-239 (Pu-239) were practical for developing a first-generation nuclear weapon. After doing so, I could go on to describe how Manhattan Project engineers developed two weapons: a U-235 bomb based on isolating that isotope from its much more populous U-238 sister isotope, and a plutonium bomb based on synthesizing that element by neutron bombardment of natural uranium in a nuclear reactor.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2020
PAPERS|
November 01 2020
Why Only U-235 and Pu-239? Classroom-Level Graphs for Understanding Heavy-Element Weaponizability Factors
B. Cameron Reed
B. Cameron Reed
Alma College
, Alma, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Teach. 58, 556–559 (2020)
Citation
B. Cameron Reed; Why Only U-235 and Pu-239? Classroom-Level Graphs for Understanding Heavy-Element Weaponizability Factors. Phys. Teach. 1 November 2020; 58 (8): 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0002376
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
390
Views
Citing articles via
Direct Observations and Measurements of Single Atoms
Natascha Hedrich, Ilia Sergachev, et al.
Using Math in Physics: 6. Reading the physics in a graph
Edward F. Redish
Where Is Half of the Universe?
Don Lincoln
Related Content
An examination of the potential fission-bomb weaponizability of nuclides other than 235U and 239Pu
Am. J. Phys. (January 2017)
Composite cores and tamper yield: Lesser-known aspects of Manhattan Project fission bombs
Am. J. Phys. (February 2020)
Women and Men of the Manhattan Project
The Physics Teacher (April 2010)
Resource Letter MP-2: The Manhattan project and related nuclear research
American Journal of Physics (February 2011)
Resource Letter MP-1: The Manhattan Project and related nuclear research
American Journal of Physics (September 2005)