PhysPort (www.physport.org) has become the go-to place for physics educators to learn to apply research-­based teaching and assessment in their classrooms. Usage (defined as the total number of visits) has doubled every two years since the site was released in 2011, and 20% of all U.S. physics faculty and 7% of U.S. high school physics teachers are now verified educators on PhysPort. The lead author conceived of PhysPort in 2007 after meeting many physics instructors interested in incorporating results of physics education research (PER) in their classrooms but with no idea where to start. At the time, most PER results were only available in research journals, which required instructors’ time and effort to find articles and read them, and there was no central place to learn about results and implications for classroom practice. Throughout its development, PhysPort has been based on user research: PhysPort staff interview physics instructors about their needs, design the site based on those needs, and conduct usability testing to see how they meet those needs. PhysPort is a joint product of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) and Kansas State University (K-State), with contributions from many universities, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), and a library within the ComPADRE.org digital library. The site (originally called the PER User’s Guide) was first funded by an NSF grant in 2009 and released in November 2011. This article presents an overview of resources on PhysPort, discussion of research and development of the site, and data on the continuing growth of site usage.

1.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
,
Eleanor
C.
Sayre
,
Mathew “Sandy”; Martinuk
, and
Alexander
Bell
, “Personas as a Powerful Methodology to Design Targeted Professional Development Resources,” in
Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014
, Vol.
2
, edited by
J. L.
Polman
et al. (
International Society of the Learning Sciences
,
Boulder, CO
,
2014
), p.
1082
.
2.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah
B.
McKagan
,
Mathew “Sandy” Martinuk
,
Alexander
Bell
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
Research-based assessment affordances and constraints: Perceptions of physics faculty
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
(
1
),
1
16
(
Feb.
2016
).
3.
Adrian M.
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
,
Linda E.
Strubbe
,
Eleanor C.
Sayre
,
Dina Zohrabi
Alaee
, and
Tra
Huynh
, “
User-centered personas for PhysPort
,”
Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference 2019
(
2019
).
4.
Linda E.
Strubbe
,
Adrian M.
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
Beyond teaching methods: Highlighting physics faculty’s strengths and agency
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
16
(
2
),
020105
(
July
2020
).
5.
We draw from J.
Redish
,
Letting Go of the Words: Writing Web Content that Works
(
Morgan Kaufmann
,
2007
).
6.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
9
,
020121
(
Nov.
2013
).
7.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
11
,
010115
(
June
2015
).
8.
Joshua
Von Korff
et al., “
Secondary analysis of teaching methods in introductory physics: A 50 k-student study
,”
Am. J. Phys.
84
,
969
(
Dec.
2016
).
9.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah
McKagan
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
Resource Letter: RBAI-1: Research-based assessment instruments in physics and astronomy
,”
Am. J. Phys.
8
5
,
245
(
March
2017
).
10.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
Best practices for administering concept inventories
,”
Phys. Teach.
55
,
530
536
(
Dec.
2017
).
11.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
,
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, and
Cassandra A.
Paul
, “
Resource Letter: RBAI-2: Research-based assessment instruments: Beyond physics topics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
87
,
350
(
May
2019
).
12.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Sarah B.
McKagan
, and
Eleanor C.
Sayre
, “
Best practices for administering attitudes and beliefs surveys in physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
58
,
90
93
(
Feb.
2020
).
13.
A visit or session may include looking at multiple pages within the site. Google Analytics does not provide measurement uncertainties, but measuring similar quantities in different ways in Google Analytics suggests that two significant figures is typically appropriate.
14.
Google Analytics distinguishes between
“page views” and “unique page views.” The former is any visit to a page; for the latter, if a user visits the same page multiple times within a single visit to the website, this is counted as only one unique page view. Figure 3 shows page views. See
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1257084?hl=en.
15.
All data in this article are current as of March 2019.
16.
Adrian
Madsen
,
Eleanor
Sayre
, and
Sarah
McKagan
, “
Effect size: What is it and when and how should I use it?
https://www.physport.org/recommendations/Entry.cfm?ID=93385.
17.
Chao
Liu
,
Ryen W.
White
, and
Susan
Dumais
, “
Understanding Web Browsing Behaviors Through Weibull Analysis of Dwell Time
,” in
Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
(
ACM
,
New York
,
2010
), p.
379
.
18.
Hereafter, we use “college” to refer to all institutions of higher education.
19.
We estimate the fraction of Verified Educators who are physics education researchers as the fraction who have logged into PER-Central.org as one of the last four ComPADRE libraries they visited while logged in. Logging into PER-Central is required to submit papers or reviews for the Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, edit a research group profile on the map of PER groups, or perform other common tasks for physics education researchers.
20.
Susan
White
,
Rachel
Ivie
, and
Arnell
Ephraim
. “
Number of Physics Faculty Members: Results from the 2010 Survey of Physics Degree-Granting Departments
” (
2012
), https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/number-physics-faculty-members.
21.
Susan
White
and
Raymond
Chu
, “
Number of Physics Faculty in Two-Year Colleges: Results from the 2012 Survey of Physics in Two-Year Colleges
” (
2013
), https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/number-physics-faculty-two-year-colleges.
22.
Susan
White
and
John
Tyler
, “
Who Teaches High School Physics? Results from the 2012-13 Nationwide Survey of High School Physics Teachers
” (
2014
), https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/who-teaches-high-school-physics-0.
23.
The fraction of verified educators who used instant verification is an imperfect estimate of the fraction who are AAPT members. Some AAPT members may not use instant verification, since it is not available for students, or they may have forgotten their AAPT password. And some PhysPort users who used instant verification in the past may no longer be AAPT members. However, we assume that these effects are small and tend to cancel each other out.
24.
We note here and on the site the caveat that PhysPort provides translations of assessments as a service to its users, but does not endorse the accuracy or validity of translations. Assessments validated for one language and culture may not be valid for other languages and cultures.
25.
Sarah
McKagan
, “
Recursos en Español/Research-based teaching resources in Spanish
,” https://www.physport.org/es.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.