There is recent evidence suggesting that formal and informal support networks for minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) can contribute to their persistence in the field. These counterspaces can serve as “safe spaces” where deficit notions of minoritized students can be challenged and where a positive collegiate climate can be established. Generally, counterspaces are found outside of STEM departments: with mentors, in campus student groups, or in conferences focused on diversity in STEM. However, two participants in a study by Johnson and colleagues reported evidence suggesting that physics departments themselves can act as counterspaces. We are inspired by this finding to investigate the role that a network of support for minoritized students in a physics department of an Eastern Canadian university has on female students’ experiences in their physics program. In this paper, we present data suggesting that participation in this network can promote forms of participation that may be especially beneficial for minoritized students in physics. We argue that this network acts as a counterspace built into the structure of a university physics department. Furthermore, we suggest that access to counterspaces such as this one may be able to provide identity resources that minoritized students draw on to position themselves as insiders when entering physics programs.

1.
M.
Ong
,
J. M
Smith
, and
L. T.
Ko
. “
Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
55
(
2
),
206
245
(
2018
).
2.
A.
Johnson
,
M.
Ong
,
L. T.
Ko
,
J.
Smith
, and
A.
Hodari
, “
Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges
,”
Phys. Teach.
55
,
356
360
(
Sept.
2017
).
3.
D.
Solorzano
,
M.
Ceja
, and
T.
Yosso
, “
Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students
,”
J. Neg. Educ.
69
(
1/2
),
60
73
(
2000
).
4.
N.
Nasir
and
J.
Cooks
, “
Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities
,”
Anthropol. Educ. Quart.
40
(
1
),
41
61
(
2009
).
5.
L. M.
Aycock
,
Z.
Hazari
,
E.
Brewe
,
K. B.
Clancy
,
T.
Hodapp
, and
R. M.
Goertzen
, “
Sexual harassment reported by undergraduate female physicists
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
15
(
1
),
010121
(
2019
).
6.
R. S.
Barthelemy
,
M.
McCormick
, and
C.
Henderson
, “
Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
(
2
),
020119
(
2016
).
7.
R.
Ivie
,
S.
White
, and
R. Y.
Chu
, “
Women’s and men’s career choices in astronomy and astrophysics
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
(
2
),
020109
(
2016
).
8.
J.
Rahm
, “Science in the Making at the Margin,” in
A Multisited Ethnography of Learning and Becoming in an Afterschool Program, a Garden, and a Math and Science Upward Bound Program
(
Sense
,
Rotterdam
,
2010
).
9.
D.
Holland
,
W.
Lachicotte
Jr.,
D.
Skinner
, and
C.
Cain
,
Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds
(
Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge
,
2001
).
10.
H. B.
Carlone
and
A.
Johnson
, “
Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
44
(
8
),
1187
1218
(
2007
).
11.
H. B.
Carlone
,
C. M.
Scott
, and
C.
Lowder
, “
Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
51
(
7
),
836
869
(
2014
).
12.
J. G.
Stout
,
T. A.
Ito
,
N. D.
Finkelstein
, and
S. J.
Pollock
, “
How a gender gap in belonging contributes to the gender gap in physics participation
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1513
(
1
),
402
405
(
2013
).
13.
D.
Muijs
,
M.
Ainscow
,
C.
Chapman
, and
M.
West
,
Collaboration and Networking in Education
(
Springer Science & Business Media
,
2011
).
14.
S.
Wasserman
and
K.
Faust
,
Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Social network analysis: Methods and Applications
(
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
,
1994
).
15.
S.
Kvale
,
InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing
(
Sage
,
1996
).
16.
H. K.
Adriansen
, “
Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research
,”
Qual. Stud.
3
(
1
),
40
55
(
2012
).
17.
J.
Saldaña
,
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
(
Sage
,
2015
).
18.
S. P.
Borgatti
,
M. G.
Everett
, and
L. C.
Freeman
, “Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis” (
Analytic Technologies
,
Harvard, MA
,
2002
).
19.
R. A.
Hanneman
and
M.
Riddle
,
Introduction to Social Network Methods
(
University of California
,
Riverside, Riverside, CA
,
2005
), http://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/.
20.
A. J.
Gonsalves
, “
‘Physics and the girly girl—There is a contradiction somewhere’: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics
,”
Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ.
9
,
503
521
(
2014
).
21.
A. J.
Gonsalves
,
A. T.
Danielsson
, and
H.
Pettersson
, “
Masculinity and experimental practices in physics: A view from three case studies
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
,
020120
(
2016
).
22.
B.
Francis
,
L.
Archer
,
J.
Moote
,
J.
de Witt
, and
L.
Yeomans
, “
Femininity, science, and the denigration of the girly girl
,”
Brit. J. Soc. Educ.
38
(
8
),
1097
1110
(
2017
).
23.
K.
Rainey
,
M.
Dancy
,
R.
Mickelson
,
E.
Stearns
, and
S.
Moller
, “
Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM
,”
Int. J. STEM Educ.
5
(
1
),
10
(
2018
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.