Some of the reasons for the underrepresentation of women in physics are evident in the reflections of two undergraduate women. Leia is a chemistry major who loves college-level physical chemistry and quantum mechanics but does not identify with the discipline of physics, partly because she has low self-efficacy as a physicist and has received very little recognition for her work and learning in physics. Paulette is a physics major who loves physics but feels isolated by the current physics learning environment. She reluctantly dropped an honors introductory lab after being snubbed by her male classmates, who partnered with one another, leaving her to work alone. Paulette’s experiences with condescending male professors activated a stereotype threat about who can succeed in physics that caused her to disengage in class. In addition to these things, in this paper we discuss what these women felt has helped them so far and explore their suggestions for what would help women in physics courses as they pursue their quest for a physical science degree.
References
1.
H.
Carlone
and A.
Johnson
, “Understanding the science experience of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytical lens
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
44
, 1187
(2007
).2.
Z.
Hazari
, R. H.
Tai
, and P. M.
Sadler
, “Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors
,” Sci. Educ.
91
, 847
(2007
).3.
Z.
Hazari
, G.
Sonnert
, P.
Sadler
, and M.
Shanahan
, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
47
, 978
(2010
).4.
L.
Sax
, K.
Lehman
, R.
Barthelemy
, and G.
Lim
, “Women in physics: A comparison to science, technology, engineering, and math education over four decades
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
, 020108
(2016
).5.
K.
Rosa
and F.
Mensah
, “Educational pathways of Black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
, 020113
(2016
).6.
I.
Rodriguez
, G.
Potvin
, and L.
Kramer
, “How gender and reformed introductory physics impacts student success in advanced physics courses and continuation in the physics major
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
, 020118
(2016
).7.
V.
Sawtelle
, E.
Brewe
, and L.
Kramer
, “Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
49
, 1096
(2012
).8.
J.
Nissen
and J.
Shemwell
, “Gender, experience, and self-efficacy in introductory physics
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
, 020105
(2016
).9.
E.
Marshman
, Z. Y.
Kalender
, C.
Schunn
, T.
Nokes-Malach
, and C.
Singh
, “A longitudinal analysis of students’ motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences
,” Can. J. Phys.
96
, 391
(2017
).10.
E.
Marshman
, Z. Y.
Kalender
, T.
Nokes-Malach
, C.
Schunn
, and C.
Singh
, “Female students with A’s have similar self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm
?” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
14
, 020123
(2018
).11.
S.
Hyater-Adams
, C.
Fracchiolla
, N.
Finkelstein
, and K.
Hinko
, “Critical look at physics identity: An operationalized framework for examining race and physics identity
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
14
, 010132
(2018
).12.
A. C.
Johnson
, “Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color
,” Sci. Educ.
91
, 5
, 805
–821
(2007
).13.
N. I.
Karim
, A.
Maries
, and C.
Singh
, “Do evidence-based active-engagement courses reduce the gender gap in introductory physics?
” Eur. J. Phys.
39
, 025701
(2018
).14.
G. C.
Marchand
and G.
Taasoobshirazi
, “Stereotype threat and women’s performance in physics
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
35
, 3050
(2013
).15.
A.
Maries
, N. I.
Karim
, and C.
Singh
, “Is agreeing with a gender stereotype correlated with the performance of female students in introductory physics?
” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
14
, 020119
(2018
).16.
17.
Z. Y.
Kalender
, E.
Marshman
, C.
Schunn
, T.
Nokes-Malach
, and C.
Singh
, “Why female science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors do not identify with physics: They do not think others see them that way
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
15
, 020148
(2019
).18.
R. M.
Locke
, Z.
Hazari
, and G.
Potvin
, “Impact of out-of-class science and engineering activities on physics identity and career intentions
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
15
, 020137
(2019
).19.
C.
Steele
and J.
Aronson
, “Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans
,” Attitudes Soc. Cogn.
69
, 797
(1995
).20.
C.
Steele
, Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do
(WW Norton & Company
, 2011
).21.
S. L.
Beilock
, R. J.
Rydell
, and A. R.
McConnell
, “Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover
,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.
136
, 256
(2007
).22.
K. R.
Binning
, N.
Kaufmann
, E.
McGreevy
, O.
Fotuhi
, S.
Chen
, E.
Marshman
, Z. Y.
Kalender
, L.
Limeri
, L.
Betancur
, and C.
Singh
, “Changing social norms to foster the benefits of collaboration in diverse workgroups
,” unpublished manuscript, d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/36006.23.
P.
Heller
and M.
Hollabaugh
, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 637
(July
1992
).© 2020 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2020
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.