Computational thinking” (CT) is still a relatively new term in the lexicon of learning objectives and science standards. The term was popularized in an essay by Wing, who said, “To reading, writing and arithmetic, we should add computational thinking to every child’s analytical ability.” Agreeing with this premise, in 2013 the authors of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) included “mathematical and computational thinking” as one of eight essential science and engineering practices that K-12 teachers should strive to develop in their students. There is not yet widespread agreement on the precise definition or implementation of CT, and efforts to assess CT are still maturing, even as more states adopt K-12 computer science standards. In this article we will try to summarize what CT means for a typical introductory (i.e., high school or early college) physics class. This will include a discussion of the ways that instructors may already be incorporating elements of CT in their classes without knowing it.
References
1.
Jeannette M.
Wing
, “Computational
thinking
,” Commun. ACM
49
(3
), 33
–35
(March
2006
).2.
NGSS Lead States
, Next
Generation Science Standards: By States, for States
(The
National Academies Press
, 2013
).3.
Code.
org
, “2018 State of Computer Science
Education
,” https://code.org/files/2018_state_of_cs.pdf
(2018
).4.
David
Weintrop
, Elham
Beheshti
, Michael
Horn
, Kai
Orton
, Kemi
Jona
, Laura
Trouille
, and Uri
Wilensky
, “Defining computational
thinking for mathematics and science classrooms
,” J. Sci. Educ.
Technol.
25
(1
), 127
–147
(2016
).5.
Pratim
Sengupta
, John S.
Kinnebrew
, Satabdi
Basu
, Gautam
Biswas
, and Douglas
Clark
, “Integrating computational
thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical
framework
,” Educ. Inf. Technol.
18
(2
), 351
–380
(June
2013
).6.
Shuchi
Grover
and Roy
Pea
, “Computational thinking in K-12: A
review of the state of the field
,” Educ. Res.
42
(1
), 38
–43
(2013
).7.
R.
Chabay
and B.
Sherwood
, “Computational physics in the
introductory calculus-based course
,” Am. J. Phys.
76
, 307
(April
2008
).8.
Chris Orban and American Association of
Physics Teachers
, “Coding in high school physics and physical
science
,” https://www.compadre.org/books/HSCoding
(2019
).9.
American Association of Physics
Teachers
, PICUP: Partnership for Integration of Computation in
Undergraduate Physics
, https://www.compadre.org/PICUP/
(2019
).10.
C.
M.
Orban
, R. M.
Teeling-Smith
, J. R. H.
Smith
, and C. D.
Porter
, “A hybrid approach for using
programming exercises in introductory physics
,” Am. J.
Phys.
86
, 831
–838
(Nov.
2018
).11.
GNU general public license
,
version 3, https://ngss.nsta.org/Practices.aspx?id=5 (2014
), accessed
May 1,
2019.12.
“
Computational Modeling in Physics
with Bootstrap
,” https://www.compadre.org/precollege/cmp/ (2018
), accessed
May 1,
2019.13.
N.
G.
Holmes
and C. E.
Wieman
, “Introductory physics labs: We
can do better
,” Phys. Today
71
(1
), 38
–45
(Jan.
2018
).14.
N.
G.
Holmes
and Emily M.
Smith
, “Operationalizing the AAPT
learning goals for the lab
,” Phys. Teach.
57
, 296
–299
(May
2019
).15.
Although there are the subtle differences between
computation (or coding) and CT, as discussed in the section “Defining Computational
Thinking,” for simplicity of language in this section we treat “computation/CT” as one
thing unless noted otherwise.
16.
“
The Physics of Video
Games
,” hourofcode.com, https://hourofcode.com/stemcod,
accessed July 16,
2019.17.
R.
Landau
, “Computational physics: A better
model for physics education?
” Comput. Sci. Eng.
8
(5
), 22
–30
(Sept.
2006
).18.
Ernie
Behringer
, “AAPT recommendations for
computational physics in undergraduate physics curricula
,” Bull.
Am. Phys. Soc.
62
(6
) (2017
).19.
T.
O. B.
Odden
, What Is This Thing Called Sensemaking?:
A Theoretical Framework for How Physics Students Resolve Inconsistencies in
Understanding
, PhD thesis, The University of Wisconsin -
Madison
(2017
).20.
Odd Petter
Sand
, Tor Ole B.
Odden
, Christine
Lindstrøm
, and Marcos
Caballero
, “How computation can
facilitate sensemaking about physics: A case study
,” Physics
Education Research Conference
, Washington,
DC
, August 1-2, 2018
.21.
Malcolm
Wells
, David
Hestenes
, and Gregg
Swackhamer
, “A modeling method for high
school physics instruction
,” Am. J. Phys.
63
, 606
–619
(July
1995
).22.
23.
Seymour Papert
, Mindstorms:
Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas
(Basic Books,
Inc.
, New York
,
1980
).24.
Andrea
Disessa
, “Computational literacy and
‘the big picture’ concerning computers in mathematics education
,”
Math. Thinking Learn.
20
, 3
–31
(2018
).25.
See, for instance,
Bruce L.
Sherin
, “A comparison of programming
languages and algebraic notation as expressive languages for physics
,”
Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn.
6
(1
), 1
–61
(May
2001
).26.
CT-STEM assessments, CT-STEM Project, https://ctstem.northwestern.edu/curricula/assessments/
(
2019
).27.
“
Planetoids with
Momentum
!” YouTube.com, http://go.osu.edu/planetoidsmomentum (2018
), accessed
May 1,
2019.28.
J.
M.
Aiken
, M. D.
Caballero
, S. S.
Douglas
, J. B.
Burk
, E.
M.
Scanlon
, B. D.
Thoms
, and M. F.
Schatz
, “Understanding student
computational thinking with computational modeling
,” Am. Inst.
Phys. Conf. Ser.
1513
, 46
–49
(Jan.
2013
).29.
Marcos D.
Caballero
, John B.
Burk
, John M.
Aiken
, Brian D.
Thoms
, Scott S.
Douglas
, Erin M.
Scanlon
, and Michael F.
Schatz
, “Integrating numerical
computation into the modeling instruction curriculum
,” Phys.
Teach.
52
, 38
–42
(Jan.
2014
).30.
A.
Cromer
, “Stable solutions using the
Euler approximation
,” Am. J. Phys.
49
, 455
–459
(May
1981
).31.
K.
Roos
, “Simple Hanging Harmonic
Oscillator
,” https://www.compadre.org/picup/exercises/exercise.cfm?I=135&A=SHHO,
(2016
).32.
N.
G.
Holmes
and D. A.
Bonn
, “Quantitative comparisons to
promote inquiry in the introductory physics lab
,” Phys.
Teach.
53
, 352
–355
(Sept.
2015
).33.
Bethany R.
Wilcox
and H. J.
Lewandowski
, “Developing skills versus
reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from a survey of students’ beliefs about
experimental physics
,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
13
, 010108
(Feb.
2017
).34.
Douglas
Brown
and Anne J.
Cox
, ”Innovative use of video
analysis
,” Phys. Teach.
47
, 145
–150
(March
2009
).35.
These videos are now only accessible through
Pivot Interactives. Direct measurement video is now Pivot Interactives, https://www.pivotinteractives.com/direct-measurement-video
(
2019
).36.
Matthew
Vonk
, Peter
Bohacek
, Cheryl
Militello
, and Ellen
Iverson
, “Developing model-making and
model-breaking skills using direct measurement video-based activities
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
13
, 020106
(Aug.
2017
).© 2020 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2020
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.